Quantcast
Channel: For the Love of His Truth » Gretha Wiid
Viewing all 16 articles
Browse latest View live

Kingdom of God vs. Women Preachers

$
0
0

“But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.” (1Co 11:3)

“11 Let a woman learn in silence, in all subjection. 12 And I do not allow a woman to teach nor to exercise authority [over] a man, but to be in silence.” (1Ti 2:11-12 LIT)

“34 ¶ Let your women be silent in the churches, for it is not allowed to them to speak, but to be in subjection, as also the Law says. 35 But if they desire to learn anything, let them question their husbands at home; for it is a shame for a woman to speak in a church. 36 ¶ Or did the Word of God go out from you? Or did it reach only to you?” (1Co 14:34-36)

Let us start with the definition that: Preaching is Teaching is Governing.

TEACHER:

To teach or instruct; one whose business or occupation is to instruct others; an instructor; a tutor.

One who instructs others in religion; a preacher; a minister of the gospel; sometimes, one who preaches without regular ordination.

One involved in activities of educating or instructing or teaching; activities that impart knowledge or skill.

TEACH applies to any manner of imparting information or skill so that others may learn INSTRUCT suggests methodical or formal teaching

EDUCATE implies development of the mind

TRAIN stresses instruction and drill with a specific end in view

DISCIPLINE implies training in habits of order and precision.

PREACHER:

To urge acceptance or abandonment of an idea or course of action.

To proclaim or publish tidings; specifically, to proclaim the gospel; to discourse publicly on a religious subject or from a text of Scripture; to deliver a sermon.

To give serious advice on morals or religion, to discourse in the manner of a preacher.

To inculcate in public discourse, to urge with earnestness by public teaching.

To deliver or pronounce such as to preach a sermon.

To teach or instruct by preaching, to inform by preaching.

To advise or recommend earnestly a course of action.

We can easily see that Teaching and Preaching are essentially the same thing with the latter concentrating mostly on religious matters but with a lot of subjects overlapping.

Moreover Teaching/Preaching is also a form of governing for the audience is expected to put into practice the instruction received. Also the Teacher/Preacher has ascendancy over the audience for he is the giver and they are the receivers, in other words the Teacher/Preacher is in a position of superiority over the addressees for he is imparting instructions to them.

Immediately we see that if a woman Teaches/Preaches she is in a superior position to the audience and that is in clear and direct conflict with 1Co 11:3 and the others, above.

But let us develop the theme further.

What is the definition of the Kingdom of God? Our Lord Jesus has given many examples of the Kingdom but the essential one covering them all is this:

“The Kingdom of God is where His Sovereign will is carried out perfectly according to His commands and decrees”.

At the moment this is so in Heaven, but here on the earth we are to pray: “And He (Jesus) said to them: When you pray, say, Our Father who is in Heaven, hallowed be Your name, let Your kingdom come, let Your will be done on earth as it also is in Heaven.” (Luk 11:2)

To be sure, God is Sovereign and present all over His creation and this is not to be confused with the Kingdom of God where everything is done perfectly according to His will. God is all-powerful and has control over everything, there is nothing that exists and lives without His control, absolutely nothing. This earth although under the full control of God is not totally part of His Kingdom, as defined. His Kingdom on this earth is where the believers that do His will are, that is the true church. Anyone that say he is a believer should also do the will of God and not his own and be totally dedicated to: “But seek the Kingdom of God and all these things will be added to you.” (Luk 12:31)

Anyone who says he is a believer but does things rather according to his own volition he is not seeking the Kingdom of God, but he is part of the world and has established his own personal kingdom. “Do not love the world nor the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him,” (1Jo 2:15)

We are called also to be perfect: “Therefore, you be perfect even as your Father in Heaven is perfect.” (Mat 5:48) and to be perfect we must do the will of God to His glory, not our fancy notions. Thus it is not sufficient for anybody to says that he feel to be called to the ministry of preaching, amongst others, but this “calling” has to be tested, endorsed and substantiated by God’s rules, i.e. His Word, the Bible.

The best thing to do to ever understand well anything and to develop a solid basis is to start at the beginning: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth;” (Gen 1:1). This statement sets the scene parameters in that it categorically states that “at the beginning GOD” there was nothing except God and that all the subsequent events have their beginning and reason to exist in God and in nothing else. This means that all our reasoning and actions must have their being in God and must be according to His will to be real: “For in him we live, and move, and have our being; …..” (Act 17:28). Anything that is not in conformity with His dictates, the Bible, is false and has to be rejected.

The principles of living in the Kingdom of God begin in Genesis chapter one and end in Revelation and we do well to stick closely to them. In Genesis we see that the Lord created man for His purposes as the image and glory of God. After a while God says to Himself: “And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.” (Gen 2:18). From that we gather that Adam was in need of a companion as his helper. Now a helper is not equal or superior to the one he helps as per the definition: “One that helps; an assistant”. Moreover, Adam’s helper was extracted from Adam and therefore a derivate of Him, which by the logic of things makes the helper subservient to its source. And this is the first principle of the man’s ascendancy over the woman: “For Adam was first formed, then Eve.” (1Ti 2:13).

Secondly, soon after her creation we see that in the Garden of Eden the Devil deceived her. This was not true for Adam. He sinned, but he was not deceived. Eve driven by the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life had allowed herself to be mislead and fell into disobedience and for that she received a specific punishment: “To the woman he said, I will greatly multiply your sorrow and your conception; in sorrow you shall bring forth children; and your desire shall be to your husband, and he shall rule over you.” (Gen 3:16) And here is the second reason for woman to be in subjection to the man: “And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.” (1Ti 2:14)

Thus this is the beginning and by the principle of the “first appearance” all discussion and reference on the roles of man and woman must by necessity refer to here:

Man was created first and as the image and glory of God whilst the woman (the derivative) was made as the glory of man” 1Co 11:7.

Moreover the woman was deceived by the Evil one and fell into transgression whilst the man was not deceived.

These two statements absolutely preclude woman to ever have any authority over the man, in any possible field, whether in the Church or in the World, for all is of God. If any woman goes against these declarations, she is expressedly going against the clear dictates of God and she is an avowed rebel and one day she will have to render an account to God for her rebellion.

Of course Leftists, Libertines, Modernists and Liberals do all they can to dismiss the first three chapters of Genesis as mythological and irrelevant to our modern enlightened days for we have advanced so much and the catch phrases are like: “surely in the 21th century you do not believe such fairy tales?” But the crux of the matter is that if the first 3 chapters of Genesis are removed, then the whole Bible would make no sense at all, and this is really what they want to do, to dispose of the Bible for It proclaims a God that limits their desire to revel in their debauchery.

Anyone that does not take the first 3 chapters of Genesis as true and does not believe that Adam and Eve were real persons; he is no Christian at all.

Indeed a prominent woman televangelist flatly rejects the Bible verses that forbid any woman from teaching or exercising authority over a man such as: 1Ti 2:12. But of course she has to, otherwise she would be a total hypocrite.

Do these famous pants wearing women give the impression of being Christian with their short hair and masculine manners??

      

In these latter evil days we are bombarded from all sides by all sorts of new ideas. The unbelievable suggestion of yesterday, entertained only by a few fanatics, is today the bold reform, and tomorrow will be the accepted practice. Novelties are so numerous and so wild and rash, that in even conservative minds the feeling of wonder is exhausted and the instinct of righteous resistance fatigued, if not lost altogether. Just a few years ago the preaching women were universally condemned among all conservative denominations of Christians. Now the idea is being presented to the churches, and female preachers are knocking at our doors. We are already told that public opinion is being swayed because of the boldness and reasonableness of the claims of these woman preachers that even our own ministers are hesitant to speak out against the movement. Only in the U.S. women preachers number over 20 thousands.

But how all this spiritual rot came to be?

The apostasy of the hour came when men and women having rejected Bible truth, are confused about the most basic things. Many men are trying to be like women in dress and manner, while many women are demanding the right to be like men, to dress like men, to do the same work as men, to play the same sports as men, to fight in armies like men. They want more than equal pay for equal work; they are demanding a man’s place in the home, church, and state. Sadly, the church is always affected by society. Thus the rebellion of women in the world is causing similar problems in the churches, and we find women demanding leadership roles in many Christian, if not all of them.

The first sign of this “Downgrade” appeared during the lifetime of that “Prince of preachers” Charles Haddon Spurgeon and he firstly coined the correct phrase “Downgrade”. In his own words: “At the end of the Puritan age, by some means or other, first the ministers, then the Churches, got on “the down grade,” and in some cases, the descent was rapid, and in all, very disastrous. In proportion as the ministers seceded from the old Puritan godliness of life, and the old Calvinistic form of doctrine, they commonly became less earnest and less simple in their preaching, more speculative and less spiritual in the matter of their discourses, and dwelt more on the moral teachings of the New Testament, than on the great central truths of revelation. Natural theology frequently took the place, which the great truths of the gospel ought to have held, and the sermons became more and more Christless. Corresponding results in the character and life, first of the preachers and then of the people, were only too plainly apparent.”

It is interesting to note some dates:

Charles Darwin (1809 – 1882

Charles H. Spurgeon (1834-1892)

“The Origin of Species” published November 24 1859. This is the official start of that most ungodly Theory of Evolution that in effects supplants God in the minds of many.

Revised New Version published in 1881. This version was guided by two unbelievers, Westcott and Hort; that rejected the Textus Receptus for the corrupted version of Origen. Indeed in 1890 Mar. 4th – Westcott admitted his disbelief in the fundamental basis of the Bible and did not believe that Genesis 1-3 should be taken literally: “No one now, I suppose, holds that the first three chapters of Genesis, for example, give a literal history – I could never understand how any one reading them with open eyes could think they did – yet they disclose to us a Gospel. Interesting to note that Jesus, Paul and the Apostles frequently referred to those.

Interesting how all these factors coincided with that early breakdown in Christianity. That was known as the ‘Downgrade controversy’. There were two aspects to this development. Firstly, the publication in 1859 of Charles Darwin’s ‘On the Origin of Species’ and in 1871 of ‘The Descent of Man’, had had an enormous influence on many thinking people and there was a widespread and growing conviction that the Scriptures were no longer a reliable basis for belief in our creational beginnings and the theory of Evolution appealed very much to the carnal side of man for in effect it did away with God. Parallel with this was the growth of what was called “higher criticism” of the Bible. Scholars were examining the text of the Scriptures, not with the eye of faith nor by the aid of the Spirit, but with a secular mind that questioned its authorship as well as the veracity of long–held understandings and interpretations “Has God said?”. As a result of their pronouncements, many people felt they could no longer adhere to the traditional views of the Bible.

Listen to Spurgeon’s own words of warning: “Biblical truth is like the pinnacle of a steep, slippery mountain. One step away, you find yourself on the downgrade. Once a church or individual Christian gets on the downgrade, momentum takes over. Recovery is unusual and only happens when Christians get on the ‘up-line’ through spiritual revival.” As one very well respected pastor has insightfully noted, “Christians today tend to forget that modernism was not first of all a theological agenda, but a methodological one.” Spurgeon was right and this is exactly what we are facing today.

Nevertheless Spurgeon faithfully stuck with the truth of God: “The old truth that Calvin preached, that Augustine preached, that Paul preached, is the truth that I must preach today, or else be false to my conscience and my God. I cannot shape the truth; I know of no such thing as paring off the rough edges of a doctrine.’’

And so we “the seven thousand left” must go on to preach that old truth to our last gulp of air.

And so from the second half of the 1800 the Downgrade it was truly down hill slide, especially sustained by the 2 World Wars, with WWII fuelling to no end the secularisation of society with the aid of that satanically devised Democracy system and its daughter, Feminism.

To make the point, it is estimated that today in England, that bulwark of Christianity that sent million of missionaries all over the world, only less than 4% of the population attends church regularly, and decreasing fast. In Europe the situation is even worse. The writers of the New EU constitution steadfastly refused to even introduce a statement in it saying that Europe had its roots in Christianity, let alone stating that we live under God.

And from here the thousands of women preachers were spawned. Firstly with that theory of Evolution the Bible was rejected as the source of inerrant divine guide, then Democracy has made everyone equal reducing God’s ordinances for His creation null and void. (if this were at all possible)

As Spurgeon cried with deep insight: “Once a church or individual Christian gets on the downgrade, momentum takes over, recovery is unusual.” And there our modern church is found falling away in profound decadency with most churches having “ICHABOD” written on their doors.

The issue of Women Preachers is just one of the symptoms of this malaise of the church and so from all sides the word now used is “Post Christian Era”. But here we are dealing with this “cancer” of women preachers in the church. The Bible speaks too clearly on this subject for there to be any confusion. The problem is that churches too often are looking to sources other than the Bible for guidance; indeed they are fully steeped in the tenets of secularism. God loves women as much as He does men. Women are as important to the home, church, and society as men are. In Jesus Christ, women enjoy the same access to salvation and blessings before God as men do. This does not mean, though, there is no difference in men and women in their appearance and roles. There is a basic truth, which needs to be restated in the church and society today: Men and women are different and are not interchangeable!

Men and women were made for different roles. The New Testament affirms that men are to be the leaders in the home, church, and state. Women were not created to rule these divine institutions; men were. The prophet Isaiah was condemning Israel when he said women ruled over them (Isa 3:12). In the church (and in society), according to the Bible, no woman is qualified to be a pastor or a deacon or in any other leadership position over men for the simple fact that God has made her a woman. Who says that? God says!

“Let the woman learn in silence, with all subjection. But I do not allow a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, was in the transgression” (1Ti 2:11-14).

“Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak: but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also says the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only? If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord” (1Co 14:34-37).

How could a woman possibly be a preacher when she is forbidden to teach or to have any authority over men? Women can only be preachers if they openly disobey the Bible’s teaching.  Note, furthermore: “if they will learn any thing”  which further strengthen the fact that they cannot teach.  

Further, the Lord Jesus Christ appointed no female apostles, nor He personally instructed women. All of them were men. The standards for pastors apply strictly to men. Only a man can be the “husband of one wife” and can “rule his own house well” (1Ti 3:2,4; Tit 1:6).

PAUL’S INSTRUCTIONS ARE FOR ALL CHURCHES OF ALL CENTURIES

Some are saying that the commands quoted above were meant only for first century Christians, or were only for the particular situation at Corinth. This cannot be true for many reasons. Consider:

The Epistles of Paul are taken by all as God inspired Scripture and thus his instructions in 1 Corinthians 14 are the commandments of the Lord (verse 37). As such they must be obeyed by all Christians and by every church in all times.

The Apostle said that the instructions of 1 Corinthians 14 are a test of spirituality. He said that those who are truly spiritual must acknowledge that the instructions are the very commandments of God. “If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord” (1Co 14:37).

In 1 Timothy the Apostle gives the very same instructions concerning women, and this epistle was said to have been written to teach the proper order for churches. The things contained in 1 Timothy are specific instructions about church order to be obeyed by all churches in every century; and it is in this book, the book that contains standards for church leaders, that God has forbidden women from taking authority over or teaching men.

In giving the instructions about women in the church, the Holy Spirit referred back to the original order of creation (the first 3 chapters of Genesis), Adam first, then Eve. The Holy Spirit, in guiding Paul’s pen, used this order of creation to prove that women must not take authority over men. Therefore, since the order of creation has not changed since 1 Timothy was written, and since it does not change in our culture or century, we know that the instructions of the New Testament about the woman’s role in the church apply to us today and tomorrow.

Paul referred to the Fall for support of his teaching regarding the woman’s subjection to the man. “And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression” (1Ti 2:14). Again this shows that the Apostle’s teaching about the woman transcends any one culture or generation, remember that Paul war writing in the New Testament. Though we have been saved from the eternal consequences of the Fall when we receive the Lord Jesus Christ, we are still living under the abiding consequences and conditions of the Fall as long as we remain in this world.

Redemption has three aspects that must never be confused: past, present, and future. The three are seen in Romans chapter eight. Romans 8:1-10 speaks of the past aspect of our salvation–we have been saved from the eternal consequences of sin. Because of what Jesus Christ has done for us on the Cross we have been made eternally free from any fear of the wrath of God or punishment for our sin by God’s holy law. Praise the Lord! Rom 8:11-17 speaks of the present aspect of our salvation: we are being saved from the power of sin in our daily lives by the Spirit of God who indwells us. Rom 8:18-25 speaks of the future aspect of salvation: we will be saved from the very presence of sin when Christ gives us our resurrection body and comes to renew this fallen creation. We have eternal redemption right now as a present possession, yet we still “groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body” (Romans 8:23).

Likewise, the woman who trusts Christ receives eternal freedom in Him from the wages of sin, but she is not yet free from some of the consequences of Eve’s rebellion in the Garden of Eden. She still is to be in subjection to the man.

Paul referred to human nature to support his teaching regarding women. “And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression” (1Ti 2:14). The woman has a different makeup than the man. She was designed for a different role in life than that of the man; that of a wife and mother. Her emotional, psychological, and rational makeup is geared perfectly for this, but she was not designed for leadership. In the Garden of Eden the devil deceived her. This was not true for Adam. He sinned, but he was not deceived. Eve had allowed herself to be in a position of decision-making she was not supposed to occupy and she fell prey to the evil one. It is no coincidence that women have been responsible for starting many of the false “christian” movements and have played key roles in spiritism, new age, mind science cults, and other satanic activities. Human nature has not changed and neither has God’s restrictions against women preachers.

Paul commanded that his instructions were to be kept until Christ’s coming. “That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1Ti 6:14). This command is given at the end of the epistle in which the Apostle had so clearly required that women be in subjection to men(1Ti 2:9-15). Since Jesus has not yet appeared, we are to continue to maintain these restrictions. Not forgetting Jesus’ words apropos: “For truly I say to you, Till heaven and earth pass, one stroke or one pronunciation mark shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” (Mat 5:18)

Paul’s letter to Corinth, in which he spoke of women being in subjection to men, was for all Christians, not just those in Corinth. In his introduction to this epistle the Apostle tells us plainly to whom he is speaking: “To the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call on the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both their’s and our’s” (1Co 1:2). It is clear that Paul’s instructions were not intended merely for some peculiar situation at Corinth.

While Galatians 3:28 says there is neither bond nor free in Christ, other passages teach that this does not mean there are no servant/master relationships. The Christian servant is free in Christ–free from the eternal wages of sin–but he is not free from his earthly position and responsibilities of servitude toward his master (Eph 6:5-8; Col 3:22-25; 1Ti 6:1,2; Tit 2:9-10; 1Pe 2:18-25). In fact, anyone who teaches against these instructions regarding submission of servants to masters is labelled proud and evil: “Let as many servants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honour, that the name of God and his doctrine be not blasphemed. And they that have believing masters, let them not despise them, because they are brethren; but rather do them service, because they are faithful and beloved, partakers of the benefit. These things teach and exhort. if any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; he is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself” (1 Timothy 6:1-5).

These are strong words, and they refer directly to those who try to contradict the Apostle’s teaching requiring subjection of servants to masters, such as those who promote communistic “liberation theology,” and those who stir up all sorts of strife between workers and business. These words also apply to those who are trying to throw off the apostolic teaching referring to woman’s subjection to man in the church and home and outside. Such are proud, ungodly, and destitute of the truth, and are to be separated from! We can see how serious this matter is in front of God.

Galatians 3:28 says there are no servants and no freemen in Christ, yet other New Testament passages teach there are indeed Christians who are servants and Christians who are masters. Galatians 3:28 also says there is neither male nor female in Christ, but other passages show us that this does not mean all distinction between the sexes are done away in this world, nor does it mean that the original order of creation has been dissolved in Christianity. Gal 3:28 refers to the fact that ALL have access to salvation in Christ not to the dismissal of hierarchical order in human relationships as prescribed by the Word of God (1Co 11:3).

In Conclusion:

  1. To understand fully any Biblical principle we must go to the beginning and any further discussion on the matter must refer to that, i.e. the principle of first appearance.

  2. The Biblical directives are not bound to a specific time or a specific culture, but are universal for all times and all cultures for they are God breathed and God is not bound by anything and He knows the beginning from the end. Besides if the Biblical principles were bound to a specific time or culture, they would be useless to future generations, the very thing that satanically inspired democratic culture wants to implement.

  3. The first three chapters of the Bible must to be accepted and believed as literal and Adam and Eve as real persons the first humans ever created and that no other humans were in the Garden, besides them. Failing to accept that pulls the rug under the Bible effectively destroying the whole Good News of Christ and His redemptive work.

  4. In the first 3 chapters of the Bible we have the foundation of the whole human drama and its hierarchical order where the man was created as the pre-eminent human and the woman was added by extraction from the man as subservient suitable helper for him. “8 For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man. 9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.” (1Co 11:8-9The man is the head, not the woman.

  5. Throughout the Bible we have passages that confirm that all distinctions between the sexes are NOT done away in this world, proving that the original order of creation has NOT been dissolved in Christianity but it is valid to the end of times.

  6. The Lord Jesus Christ appointed no female apostles, nor He personally instructed women. All of them were men. The standards for pastors apply strictly to men. Only a man can be the “husband of one wife” and can “rule his own house well” (1Ti 3:2,4; Tit 1:6)

  7. Women Preachers are a “cancer” to Christianity and are not part of the Kingdom of God. This concept is satanically inspired to dilute sound doctrine and to make Christianity fall into disuse as we so plainly see all over the world in these evil days.

“For false christs and false prophets will be raised, and they will give signs and wonders in order to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.” (Mar 13:22

__________________________

Source found here :   http://www.albatrus.org/english/living/kingdom/kingdom_vs_women_preachers.htm



Angus Buchan: Evangelist or Revivalist?

$
0
0

Our valued readers may be aware of the fact that False teacher Rick Joyner will be visiting South Africa soon and join hands with Angus Buchan and others . Please also read our articles Warning! Rick Joyner to visit South Africa and Join hands with Angus Buchan And also read Spiritual Deception, Revival and Angus Buchan (South Africa’s Charismatic “Hajj”)

Angus Buchan: Evangelist or Revivalist?

An important article by our dearly beloved  friend and brother Prof Johan Malan

Mossel Bay, South Africa (October 2010)

Angus Buchan is an evangelist and not a revivalist. An evangelist is involved with basic or first phase evangelism and usually addresses a particular group of people only once, or perhaps a few times during a weekend rally. After his listeners have indicated that they accepted Christ as Saviour, he regards his duty as done and then moves on to his next appointment.

A revivalist, by contrast, is particularly involved with second phase evangelisation as his messages are aimed at further steps of dedication and service to the Lord in the lives of those who already have a testimony of salvation. That is precisely what the word revival means – new life where there already is life. Christians are called to search themselves and make a new commitment to the Lord, and are also clearly shown what their responsibility is in the process of sanctification. When they comply with these demands, lukewarm, prayerless, powerless and spiritually unfruitful believers are transformed into dedicated witnesses for Christ. They will then fulfil their calling to testify about the saving grace of Jesus Christ, leading to the salvation of many sinners. That is the fruit of revival.

More than a century ago, Andrew Murray was at the forefront of a real revival ministry in South Africa. His books on sanctification as a further work of grace after conversion are still read all over the world. I even met a Russian preacher in Estonia who bought one of Andrew Murray’s books in Helsinki, Finland. Murray does not associate holiness with ecstatic experiences and signs and wonders but with a pure heart and enduement with power from on high.

Andrew Murray obviously also did basic evangelisation but it was always followed up with clear preaching on the filling of the Holy Spirit. Other well-known revival preachers in the 18th and 19th centuries followed the same approach. The converts from John Wesley’s meetings assembled in halls where they were taught about higher levels of spiritual dedication. They eventually established a new evangelical church.

In America, DL Moody was also an evangelist and revivalist. After evangelistic meetings were conducted in certain places and many people were saved, he followed it up with a series of messages on sanctification. Dr. RA Torrey was often requested to deliver his eight messages on sanctification during a week-long rally. They were later published under the title: The Holy Spirit – Who He is and what He Does. It made a very big difference in the lives of young believers by strongly establishing their faith and dedication. Charles Finney published a magazine to give further instruction to converts. Some of them neglected their duty to make a full surrender and to serving the Lord wholeheartedly. His words to them were: “You are a disgrace to Christianity.”

The ministry of Angus does not provide for this second phase of deeper spiritual instruction, and because of this it is somewhat presumptuous of him to often say: “We are in a revival.” The absence of this vital element of revival explains the phenomenon of why there is not a notable change in the low spiritual standards of most churches in South Africa. That so many people commit themselves to Christ for the first time at his meetings is an indication that preaching on this subject in many churches is not explicit and convincing enough.

Angus plays a very big and praiseworthy role in fulfilling this need and should be honoured for doing so. It is encouraging that a high profile person, who is in the media’s limelight, is humble and bold enough to refer to Jesus Christ as the only Saviour of the world. He also often mentions sins that separate people from the Lord. Without that, people would not be fully convicted of their sinful and lost state.

However, the fact remains that evangelisation which is not backed up by further intensive instruction from the Bible, often leads to superficial change which does not last long. It is like seeds which have been sown in shallow soil. They quickly germinate and start growing, but the young plants are not able to withstand and survive the pressure of adverse circumstances. That is why many of the converts during rallies revert to their old ways after a time.

A number of case studies on converts during gospel rallies have been conducted in the past. At places where there are no evangelical churches or Bible study groups with high standards where converts can get further instruction, more than 90% of them did not stand by their original commitment. Angus Buchan will seriously have to face this fact. In modern preaching in general, more emphasis is placed upon moralising and human relations than on an improved man-God-relationship.

Should Angus wish to achieve more success, something very definite will have to be done to provide for second phase evangelisation. In His Great Commission Christ not only said that disciples should be made of all nations, but also that they should be taught to observe all His commands (Matt. 28:19-20). This is an intensive and long-lasting task which can in most cases be better executed in small group contexts.

There are also various other matters in the preaching of Angus which cause concern. He sometimes refers to very dubious American preachers who are overly devoted to miracles, signs and wonders, as role models. Furthermore, he does not show enough understanding of Biblical eschatology. The Bible teaches that the church dispensation will end in a dark time of apostatising, tribulation and antichristian deception. Because of that, there will be a process of polarisation in which those who are filthy will become filthier, while those who are holy should become more holy. Converts should be prepared to face these challenges as their commitment to the Lord will be severely tested.

Angus, however, gives his support to kingdom reforms in terms of which the hope is raised that if most people repent, conditions in countries such as South Africa and Zimbabwe will be restored in the spiritual, moral, political as well as economic spheres. This expectation is at variance with the Biblical scenario that the majority of people will tread the broad way right down to the end, and also with the fact that we can expect more apostasy and lawlessness in the world.

Another problem which certainly has negative consequences is that Angus is so much inclined towards maintaining good relations and fostering ecumenical meetings, that he completely ignores the subject of spiritual deception and therefore has no apologetic element in his preaching. This is to the detriment of young believers as they get no guidelines for the identification of deceptive teachings. It is very good to be saved from moral sins, but there is also spiritual deception against which believers have to be warned. At one of the rallies of Angus in Port Elizabeth free DVD’s were distributed at the gates in which a false eschatology is promoted, as well as a legalistic lifestyle which includes the observance of the Old Testament Sabbath on Saturdays. The recipients did not know whether these gifts were handed out with the consent of Angus.

In spite of all these objections I have great appreciation for the fact that Angus Buchan proclaims a clear message of repentance. The value of one soul that is saved is more than all the treasures of the world. Although this promising action is not backed by a clear strategy for second phase work, thereby undoing much of the good work that has been achieved, his preaching was and still is a big blessing to many people. We should rejoice about that.

The views of Anton Bosch

I asked the opinion of Anton Bosch on the above-mentioned matter. He lived in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, for a long time before acceding to a call from a congregation in California, USA. He says the following in his letter:

“I recently watched the video Faith Like Potatoes and while that was a dramatization, I considered that with everything else I have seen and heard, and come to the conclusion that your evaluation is correct. He is an evangelist – nothing more, nothing less. The problem with evangelists (of which Billy Graham is a prime example), is that they are not equipped to do anything more than preach the gospel. That is their calling and gift. This results in two issues:

1.   They must stick to the gospel and only the gospel. The moment they begin to speak on matters of doctrine, they are out of their depth. Thus their theology cannot be trusted. Graham has proven this many times and Angus seems to be the same. That is not a reflection on them, but a reality that God has built into the church so that every member is dependant on every other member (see point 2 below). Evangelists and those around them need to understand this and not expect, or allow them to pronounce on all matters of doctrine.

2.   They need to work with other ministries who can do the follow-up. This is more than just telling people to find a good Bible-believing church. You don’t take a new-born (physical) baby, put it down in the middle of the street and tell it to find good pasteurized milk. The baby will drink anything, even poison. The baby must be parented until it comes of age. A clear example of this is with Philip: “And the multitudes with one accord heeded the things spoken by Philip, hearing and seeing the miracles which he did. For unclean spirits, crying with a loud voice, came out of many who were possessed; and many who were paralyzed and lame were healed. And there was great joy in that city…. Now when the apostles who were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them, who, when they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit” (Acts 8:6ff).

I think the distinction you draw between an evangelist and revivalist is good.”

HL - http://www.bibleguidance.co.za/Engarticles/AngusEng.htm

_________________________________________________


We thank Prof Johan Malan for his full permission to place his articles on our blog. Prof is a dear brother and friend to us and his teachings on  false teachers has been of a big  help to us and many others.

May the Lord grant us mercy to always speak the truth in love as we earnestly contend for the faith in our Lord Jesus Christ.


Usurping Women have been the originators of many false Charismatic movements !

$
0
0

One of the trademarks of Pentecostalism is that women usurp their God ordained place of submission in the church! Pentecostalism: The only religion often founded by women who usurp their place! Dominated by emotionalism!

Teaching or exercising authority over a man in the church. This includes pulpit preaching and administration.

1 Tim 2:12 But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet. 13 For it was Adam who was first created, andthen Eve. 14 And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being quite deceived, fell into transgression. 15 But women shall be preserved through the bearing of children if they continue in faith and love and sanctity with self-restraint.

Being a pastor/elder/overseer. 1 Tim 3 and Titus 1 explicitly identify that pastors MUST BE MEN.

1 Timothy 3:1 It is a trustworthy statement: if any man aspires to the office of overseer, it is a fine work he desires to do. 2 An overseer, then, must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3 not addicted to wine or pugnacious, but gentle, uncontentious, free from the love of money. 4 He must be one who manages his own household well, keeping his children under control with all dignity 5 (but if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how will he take care of the church of God?); 6 and not a new convert, lest he become conceited and fall into the condemnation incurred by the devil. 7 And he must have a good reputation with those outside the church, so that he may not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

Notice that the prohibition against women teaching or exercising authority over men in the church is IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWED BY THE CLEAR STATEMENT THAT ONLY MEN CAN BE OVERSEERS/PASTORS! One continuous text!

Miram ~ 1500 BC

Notice that Miram usurped her place by claiming to be equal with Moses! Yes Aaron was also involved, but he was following the lead of Miram who was made a leper. Aaron was not made a leper, proving she was the instigator! (Aaron was easily swayed by the people when the people made the golden calf, “the people made me do it”)

Numbers 12:1 Then Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Cushite woman whom he had married (for he had married a Cushite woman); 2 and they said, “Has the Lord indeed spoken only through Moses? Has He not spoken through us as well?” And the Lord heard it. 3 (Now the man Moses was very humble, more than any man who was on the face of the earth.) 4 And suddenly the Lord said to Moses and Aaron and to Miriam, “You three come out to the tent of meeting.” So the three of them came out. 5 Then the Lord came down in a pillar of cloud and stood at the doorway of the tent, and He called Aaron and Miriam. When they had both come forward, 6 He said,

“Hear now My words: If there is a prophet among you, I, the Lord, shall make Myself known to him in a vision. I shall speak with him in a dream.

7 “Not so, with My servant Moses, He is faithful in all My household; 8 With him I speak mouth to mouth, Even openly, and not in dark sayings, And he beholds the form of the Lord. Why then were you not afraid To speak against My servant, against Moses?”

So the anger of the Lord burned against them and He departed. 10 But when the cloud had withdrawn from over the tent, behold, Miriam was leprous, as white assnow. As Aaron turned toward Miriam, behold, she was leprous. 11 Then Aaron said to Moses, “Oh, my lord, I beg you, do not account this sin to us, in which we have acted foolishly and in which we have sinned. 12 “Oh, do not let her be like one dead, whose flesh is half eaten away when he comes from his mother’s womb!” 13 And Moses cried out to the Lord, saying, “O God, heal her, I pray!” 14 But the Lord said to Moses, “If her father had but spit in her face, would she not bear her shame for seven days? Let her be shut up for seven days outside the camp, and afterward she may be received again.” 15 So Miriam was shut up outside the camp for seven days, and the people did not move on until Miriam was received again.

Montanus ~ 150 AD

Hippolytus wrote of the Montanists, “They have been deceived by two females, Priscilla and Maximilla by name, whom they hold to be prophetesses, asserting that into them the Paraclete spirit entered…. They magnify these females above the Apostles and every gift of Grace, so that some of them go so far as to say that in them there is something more than Christ…. They introduce novelties in the form of fasts and feasts, abstinences and diets of radishes, giving these females as their authority.” (Cited in Henry BeKenson, ea., Documents of the Christian Church (London: Oxford, 1963), 77.) (Charismatic Chaos, John F. MacArthur, 1991, p. 73)

Shakers [Mother Ann Lee] ~ 1700′s

Another group that practiced a form of tongues was the Shakers, an American sect with Quaker roots that flourished in the mid-1700s. Mother Ann Lee, founder of the sect, regarded herself as the female equivalent of Jesus Christ. She claimed to be able to speak in seventy-two languages. The Shakers believed sexual intercourse was sinful, even within marriage. They spoke in tongues while dancing and singing in a trance-like state. (Charismatic Chaos, John F. MacArthur, 1991, p. 234)
“On an August day in 1837 a class of young girls, ten to fourteen years old, was meeting for instruction at the Gathering Order in Niskeyuna. Suddenly some of them began to shake and whirl. In the evening, after they had retired, the senses of three of the children appeared withdrawn from the scenes of time, and absorbed as in a trance. They began to sing, talk about angels, and describe a journey they were making, under spiritual guidance, to heavenly places.” (The People Called the Shakers, Edward Deming Andrews, p 152)

Seventh-day Adventists [Ellen White]

Ellen White founded the Seventh-day Adventist church and members must vow to believe that she was a prophet! From the 27 Fundamental beliefs, #17 “The gift of Prophecy: One of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is prophecy. This gift is an identifying mark of the remnant church and was manifested in the ministry of Ellen G. White. As the Lord’s messenger, her writings are a continuing and authoritative source of truth which provide for the church comfort, guidance, instruction, and correction.” Seventh-day Adventists refuted website

Christian Scientist [Mary Eddy] ~ 1941

Mrs. Eddy wrote, “I should blush to write of ‘Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures’ as I have, were it of human origin, and were I, apart from God, its author. But, as I was only a scribe echoing the harmonies of heaven in divine metaphysics, I cannot be super modest in my estimate of the Christian Science textbook.” (Mary Baker Eddy, The First Church of Christ, Scientist, and Miscellany (Boston: First Church of Christ, Scientist, 1941), 115.) Although the errors of Christian Science regarding God, Christ, and the Scriptures are well documented in numerous books, Mrs. Eddy was convinced she was used by God to reveal his truth for her day. (Charismatic Chaos, John F. MacArthur, 1991, p. 80)

Mrs. Cardale and her sister Emily ~ 1831

She was a member of Edward Irving’s congregation in England and on April 30, 1831 she began to speak in other tongues and prophesy. Irving was impressed and did not exercise any restraint towards this member’s activity. Soon Mrs. Cardale’s sister Emily also began to speak in tongues and prophesy, and others followed them. The end result was that Rev. Irving was eventually excommunicated from the Presbyterian Church and he formed his own organization. He was defrocked not so much for the charismatic extremism but for his heterodox view of the nature of Christ, his Christology was aberrant. Irving’s organization later began to promote to concept of restored prophets and apostles. Irving also believed that tongues and prophecy had divine origin and were truly revelatory in nature. As with Montanus (Montanism heresy , the role of the two women prophetesses became pronounced and set a pattern destined to be repeated over the coming years.

Agnes Ozman beginning of modern Pentecostalism ~ 1901

The modern Pentecostal movement began on January 1, 1901, in Bethel Bible College in Topeka, Kansas, operated by Charles Parham, a minister with a background in the Holiness movement. The students began to seek the baptism of the Spirit with tongues, and Agnes Ozman was the first student to experience speaking in tongues. She claimed she spoke in several languages immediately. She is the first woman in North America to speak in tongues!

Woodworth-Etter, Maria ~ (1844-1924)

She was one of the more mystical of all the neo-Montanist women. She was a traveling evangelist, one of the first women to take this role in America and was initially part of the holiness-healing movement. In the 1880′s she was known to go into trances and stand stock-still for hours and sometimes days. During these trance times people would come into her meetings and be miraculously healed or converted. In 1890 she reports people receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit as evidenced with the speaking in other tongues and people seeing heavenly visions. “The Holy Ghost was present in great power, with gifts, signs, and visions, following the laying-on-of-hands. There were visible signs of light and glory on the pulpit, and through the congregation seen by the natural eye by some” (Signs & Wonders, Harrison House, pg. 150-151). Sister Woodworth-Etter is possibly the source for many of the aberrant doctrines taken up by the New Order of the Latter Rain in the late 1940′s. She practiced the laying on of hands for healing (which is Biblical), delivering people from demons, and conveying spiritual gifts. Tremendous healing’s allegedly took place in her meetings, including the raising of the dead on certain occasions. Sister Etter started twelve churches, ordained twelve ministers to pastor these churches. In 1918 she built the Woodworth-Etter Tabernacle (humble huh?) in Indianapolis in which she served as pastor until her death. She must be counted as the “mother” of today’s Signs & Wonders Movement.

Foursquare Gospel Church [Aimee Semple McPherson] ~ 1920′s – 1930′s

Nationally known healing evangelist in the 1920′s – 1930′s. Founded and headed the Foursquare Gospel Church, led a controversial life and died of a drug overdose in 1944.

Kathryn Kuhlman

Kathryn Kuhlman was ordained a Baptist minister, but did not associate her ministry with any denomination She was heavily influenced by the Azusa street revival, and by the Roman Catholic church. She was well known for the manifestations that occurred at her meetings, including “laughter”. She is said to be responsible for the introduction of the manifestation of “Slain in the Spirit”. There were some differences to the current movement, though, in that she insisted that her meetings be orderly. Manifestations interrupting the service were not permitted. She was highly regarded in many Christian circles, and strongly influenced Benny Hinn and John Arnott.

Pensacola/Brownsville blessing ~ 1995-2000

The testimonies of the two young girls at Pensacola mark a major shift in that revival.

Hank Hanegraaff, author of the book Counterfeit Revival, criticized the revival for “serious distortions of biblical Christianity” in the meetings, comparing the physical manifestations to pagan practices.[15] Kilpatrick responded by issuing a prophecy aimed at Hanegraaff, claiming “within 90 days the Holy Ghost will bring you down.” This prophecy proved to be false.[16]

HL - http://www.bible.ca/tongues-women-usurp.htm

Next follow up article coming soon :  The First Blast of the Trumpet against the monstrous regiment of Women



The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women

$
0
0

As Spurgeon cried with deep insight: “Once a church or individual Christian gets on the downgrade, momentum takes over, recovery is unusual.” And there our modern church is found falling away in profound decadency with most churches having “ICHABOD” written on their doors.

The issue of Women Preachers is just one of the symptoms of this malaise of the church and so from all sides the word now used is “Post Christian Era”. But here we are dealing with this “cancer” of women preachers in the church. The Bible speaks too clearly on this subject for there to be any confusion. The problem is that churches too often are looking to sources other than the Bible for guidance; indeed they are fully steeped in the tenets of secularism. God loves women as much as He does men. Women are as important to the home, church, and society as men are. In Jesus Christ, women enjoy the same access to salvation and blessings before God as men do. This does not mean, though, there is no difference in men and women in their appearance and roles. There is a basic truth, which needs to be restated in the church and society today: Men and women are different and are not interchangeable!

Men and women were made for different roles. The New Testament affirms that men are to be the leaders in the home, church, and state. Women were not created to rule these divine institutions; men were. The prophet Isaiah was condemning Israel when he said women ruled over them (Isa 3:12). In the church (and in society), according to the Bible, no woman is qualified to be a pastor or a deacon or in any other leadership position over men for the simple fact that God has made her a woman. Who says that? God says!

“Let the woman learn in silence, with all subjection. But I do not allow a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, was in the transgression” (1Ti 2:11-14).

“Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak: but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also says the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. What? came the word of God out from you? or came it unto you only? If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord” (1Co 14:34-37).

How could a woman possibly be a preacher when she is forbidden to teach or to have any authority over men? Women can only be preachers if they openly disobey the Bible’s teaching.  Note, furthermore: “if they will learn any thing”  which further strengthen the fact that they cannot teach.  

Further, the Lord Jesus Christ appointed no female apostles, nor He personally instructed women. All of them were men. The standards for pastors apply strictly to men. Only a man can be the “husband of one wife” and can “rule his own house well” (1Ti 3:2,4; Tit 1:6).  ( above quote by aymon de albatrus)

Below is one of the best reads I have read, please follow the link below to read full article,   that deals with women in the church, it was written in 1559 and remains just as relevant today as in the days gone by. I often find myself in discussion with other women on social media concerning the matter of women as pastors/leaders in the church.  More often I am frowned upon by undiscerning women than not , about my strong conviction against any form of women usurping authority over men in the church. I echo the words from the quote above “Women can only be preachers if they openly disobey the Bible’s teaching” . If we as women make a study of Scripture it becomes clear there is only one truth. By digging into the existence of women in the church as teachers, we only need to read what Paul clearly taught in the NT.  The influence of Feminism has been immense over many, many ages and women wanting gender equality, it  has been fought and won by those who follow the lie that Feminism teaches. Sadly it has had a detrimental effect in the visible church today, to the extend that there is a genderless Bible that is also gaining popularity in the churches that chooses to follow secular humanism rather than the written Word of God.  We are sure heading toward a genderless society , as secular humanism is pushing more and more for gender equality in the name of humanism. The Bible is clear that a man and a woman differs and have different roles.

“Tertullian, in his book of Women’s Apparel, after he has shown many causes why gorgeous apparel is abominable and odious in a woman, adds these words, speaking as it were to every woman by name: ”Do you not know,” says he, “that you are Eve. The sentence of God lives and is effectual against this kind; and in this world, of necessity it is, that the punishment also live. You are the port and gate of the devil. You are the first transgressor of God’s law. You did persuade and easily deceive him whom the devil durst not assault. For your merit (that is, for your death), it behooved the Son of God to suffer the death; and does it yet abide in your mind to deck you above your skin coats?”

Augustine, in his twenty-second book written Against Faustus, proves that a woman ought to serve her husband as unto God, affirming that in nothing has woman equal power with man, saving that neither of both have power over their own bodies. By which he would plainly conclude, that woman ought never to pretend nor thirst for that power and authority which are due to man. [54]For so he does explain himself in another place, affirming that woman ought to be repressed and bridled betimes, if she aspires to any dominion; alleging that it is dangerous and perilous to suffer her to proceed, although it is in temporal and corporeal things. And thereto he adds these words: “God sees not for a time, neither is there any new thing in his sight and knowledge:” meaning thereby, that what God has seen in one woman (as concerning dominion and bearing of authority) the same he sees in all; and what he has forbidden to one, the same he also forbids to all. [55]And this most evidently yet in another place he writes, moving this question, “How can woman be the image of God, seeing (says he) she is subject to man, and has none authority, neither to teach, neither to be witness, neither to judge, much less to rule or bear empire?” [56]These are the very words of Augustine, of which it is evident that this godly writer does not only agree with Tertullian, before recited, but also with the former sentence of the Law, which takes from woman not only all authority amongst men, but also every office appertaining to man. “ (A quote from ,the First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women)

Extracted from: Selected Writings of John Knox: Public Epistles, Treatises, and Expositions to the Year 1559

The First Blast of the Trumpet is, perhaps, Knox’s most famous and controversial work. In the twentieth century, few people have read the book, and still fewer have made an attempt to understand the reformer’s position.

For Knox, the teaching of scripture alone is sufficient to prove that women should not bear rule over men. The testimony of scripture is so plain, he wrote, that “to add anything were superfluous, were it not that the world is almost now come to that blindness, that whatsoever pleases not the princes and the multitude, the same is rejected as doctrine newly forged, and is condemned for heresy” (p. 390).

Knox knew that his 16th-century opponents expected citations from classical and patristic sources. Therefore, the reformer takes aim at both the position and polemical methods of his critics by quoting some of the stoutest comments imaginable, refuting the government of women. Whether Knox personally joins with the ancient authors in every detail is immaterial; by numerous references to antiquity, the reformer demonstrates that there is a venerable history of opposition to the rule of women. Still, Knox points out that his main argument, even if stripped of the patristic citations, is fundamentally based upon the authoritative word of God. “For as I depend not upon the determinations of men, so I think my cause no weaker, albeit their authority is denied unto me; provided that God by his revealed will, and manifest word, stands plain and evident on my side” (p. 400).

Contemporary readers should also recall that, when Knox speaks of “nature,” he is often making reference to human nature. Even so, he states, “this part of nature is not my most sure foundation” (p. 385). Again, his principal concern is with the revealed will of God, written in the Bible.

The treatise was published in Geneva in 1558. As indicated in the preface, the work was published anonymously. The author wished to conceal his identity, until he had issued two more blasts, intending to disclose his name with the publication of the Third Blast. The reformer’s plan to write two sequels remained unfulfilled, although he later published a summary of the contents which he proposed to treat in the Second Blast. The summary of the Second Blast was appended originally to his Appellation (1558), but readers will find this summary following the First Blast in the present volume (pages 435-36).

Read the First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women HERE !!

Here below follows some very edifying links provided to me by Dr. Reg Barrow, President, STILL WATERS REVIVAL BOOKS , Serving Christians Worldwide (In Over 100 Countries) For 28+ Years

History & Impact of Women Preachers & Feminism http://ow.ly/buiuV (FREE MP3).

http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=7809026458

Author’s Summary: Feminism sprung out of the reinforcement of women preachers reinforced by John Wesley, Charles Finney, The Nazarines, The Pilgrim Holiness, The Quakers, D.L Moody, The Salvation Army just to name a few. Mason, William Penn were also prominent in spreading the Quaker version of the gospel. John Wesley’s mother would not conform and started being the worship leader. She circumvented her husband’s spiritual headship of the home. Mary Fletcher preached to crowds of 2-3 thousand people at the encouragement of John Wesley. Adam Clark supported the ordination of women. They called those who tried to uphold the Bible and Paul regarding the exclusion of Women from the pulpits bigots just like the homosexuals call those today who speak out against their ordination.

The Public Preaching of Women http://ow.ly/bugvP.

The Female Preacher by Ralph Erskine http://ow.ly/bugwL.

Antichrist’s Strategy: Manhattan Declaration by R.C. Sproul, John MacArthur, James White (Alpha & Omega Ministries), Richard Bennett (Berean Beacon), et al.

http://www.puritandownloads.com/antichrists-strategy-manhattan-declaration-by-r-c-sproul-john-macarthur-james-white-alpha-omega-ministries-richard-bennett-berean-beacon-et-al/

Why Psychology & Psychiatry Are Anti-Christian by Dr. Voddie Baucham, Dr. John MacArthur, Dr. Richard Ganz, Dr. Reg Barrow, et al. (Free Christian Resources)

http://www.puritandownloads.com/why-psychology-psychiatry-are-anti-christian-by-dr-voddie-baucham-dr-john-macarthur-dr-richard-ganz-dr-reg-barrow-et-al-free-christian-resources/

Women’s Rights Women by R.L. Dabney http://ow.ly/bugub.

Paul on Women Speaking in the Church by B.B. Warfield http://ow.ly/bugy3.

God’s View of Women Preachers http://ow.ly/bugyI.

Free Videos and MP3s By Dr. Voddie Baucham On the Sovereignty of God, Christ’s Resurrection, Total Depravity, Homeschooling, Apologetics, the Gospel, Psychology, Culture, Feminism, Toleration, and Why God Is Good & Bad Things Happen

http://www.puritandownloads.com/soul-stirring-free-mp3s-videos-by-dr-voddie-baucham/

Many free MP3s on Feminism

http://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?keyword=Feminism

Mothers Sermons – SermonAudio.com http://ow.ly/fxhIi

Many free sermons for Women http://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?keyword=female

Godless Public Education by Dr. Reg Barrow http://ow.ly/8Zuds.

“Public schools are, today, cesspools of Satanism.” – Brian Schwertley at http://ow.ly/araI8 in the free MP3 sermon “Hymns and Heretics: The Dangers of Uninspired Hymnody.”

Birth Control: The Biblical & Historic Protestant Position by Greg Price http://ow.ly/9IGyY (Free MP3) & http://ow.ly/aWwNl (Free PDF).

FREE PDF: Birth Control: The Biblical And Historic Protestant Position by Greg Price  http://ow.ly/aWwNl.

http://www.reformedpresbytery.org/books/birthcon/birthcontrol.pdf

THE BIBLE & BIRTH CONTROL: FREE RESOURCES http://ow.ly/9IF7z.

http://www.swrb.com/Puritan/bible-birth-control.htm

The Bible and Birth Control (5 Free MP3s) http://ow.ly/bQBuz.

Why Christians Fail to Value Babies (& Concerning Birth Control, Abortion, etc.) by Kevin Swanson Interviewing Doug Phillips, President of Vision Forum (Free MP3) http://ow.ly/9IF2p.

http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=61010918110

FREE MP3: Planned Parenthood: The Legacy of Death and Immorality by Brian Schwertley http://ow.ly/ajaEk.

Free MP3s by Charles Spurgeon On Justification By Faith Alone, Prayer and Assurance

http://www.puritandownloads.com/free-mp3s-by-charles-spurgeon-on-justification-by-faith-alone-prayer-and-assurance/

Free: God’s Sovereignty, Man’s Responsibility

http://www.puritandownloads.com/free-gods-sovereignty-mans-responsibility/

Much more: http://www.puritandownloads.com/newsletters/


THREE RELIGIOUS FABLES

$
0
0

To argue that God is “trying His best” to save all mankind, but that the majority of men will not let Him save them, is to insist that the will of the Creator is impotent, and that the will of the creature is omnipotent.” -A.W. Pink

Pastor Don Fortner

The prophecy made by the Apostle Paul in 2 Timothy 4:1-5 has come to pass in our day. All over the world men, and women, and boys, and girls gather in religious assemblies. Some are very solemn. Others can barely be distinguished from dance hall revelry. But they gather in the name of Christ to worship God. They read the Bible, say their prayers, invoke God’s blessing, and give their money. They are devoted. They are sincere. But they are lost! They have faith; but theirs is a false faith. They have hope; but their hope is a delusion. Having been led and taught by blind and ignorant men, “They will not endure sought doctrine; but after their own lusts…they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears…They turn away their ears from the truth and (have been) turned into fables.”

I am not talking about Hindus, Buddhist, and Muslims. I am talking about men and women who profess to know, worship, trust, and serve the living God by faith in his Son Jesus Christ, through the power of the Holy Spirit. I am talking about our friends, relatives, and neighbors. I am talking about many of you. You have turned away from the truth have been turned unto fables. Do I have your attention? If you will pay attention to the Word of God, God just might teach you something.

You know what a fable is. It is a brief story, dreamed up by a man to teach a moral, ethical lesson, but factually it is a lie. Here are three common religious fables, dreamed up by men to teach people moral principles. They are universally embraced, proclaimed, and defended. These three fables are constantly presented throughout the city, across this country and around the world in this day of man centered religion as the very truth of God. But they are in fact lies which are damning to the souls of all who believe them.

We here from every quarter that “God loves everyone.” You can read it on church signs, bumper stickers, and bridges all across this country. But it is a bald faced lie. God does not love everyone. He never has! Nowhere does the Bible say or imply that he does. If God loves everybody, he has a mighty strange way of showing it. Try preaching that those who perished in the flood, the sons of Korah, the damned in hell. They know better! The fact is, the Bible plainly tells us that God does not love everyone. Have you never read in his Word where God said, he hates all workers of iniquity and that he is angry with the wicked every day? Did you never read, “Jacob have I loved; but Esau have I hated?” (Psa. 11:5; 7:11; Rom. 9:13). “God is love.” We rejoice in that. But God’s love is in Christ. In the Bible there is no assurance of God’s love given to anyone apart from faith in Christ.

I have heard all my life, like you have, that “The Lord Jesus Christ died to redeem and save all people.” There is no doctrine in all the world more blasphemous than that. To say that Christ died for all people without exception is to say that he died for multitudes for whom he refused even to pray. Read it for yourself in John 17:9 and 20. To say that he died for all without exception is to say that he died in vain for the multitudes of the damned! That is blasphemy! It is a blatant declaration that Jesus Christ is a failure! If he s a failure, he is not God and is not fit to be trusted. The Bible nowhere teaches or implies that Christ died for, redeemed, or came to save those multitudes who are at last lost in hell. Those for whom Christ died shall never die! The Son of God redeemed all whom he came to redeem; and he shall save all whom he came to save.

We are told by religious leaders everywhere that “The Holy Spirit of God is doing all that he can to save all people.” You know that is not true. There are multitudes to whom the Spirit of God has never even sent his Word. The Bible says nothing of the Spirit trying to reprove, trying to convince, or trying to regenerate. The Bible declares, “It is the Spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing.” Have you been turned away from the truth? Have you been turned unto fables? May God be pleased now to turn you to the truth and cause you to receive the love of the truth, for Christ’s sake.

AMEN.

GRACE FOR TODAY Radio Message #406

THREE RELIGIOUS FABLES

Pastor Don Fortner

GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH of DANVILLE

 2734 Old Stanford Road

Danville, Kentucky 40422-9438

HL - http://www.donfortner.com/radio_notes/0406%20THREE%20RELIGIOUS%20FABLES.htm


Seven Marks of False Teachers

$
0
0

red-riding-hood---steven-n

 Thomas Brooks

The first character: False teachers are menpleasers. They preach more to please the ear than to profit the heart: “Which say to the seers, See not; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits” (Isa 30:10). “A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land; The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?” (Jer 5:30-31). They handle holy things with wit and dalliance(1) rather than with fear and reverence. False teachers are soul-undoers. They are like evil chirurgeons(2) that skin over the wound, but never heal it…False teachers are hell’s greatest enrichers…Such smooth teachers are sweet soul-poisoners (Jer 23:16-17).

The second character: False teachers are notable in casting dirt, scorn, and reproach upon the persons, names, and credits of Christ’s most faithful ambassadors. Thus, Korah, Dathan, and Abiram charged Moses and Aaron that they took too much upon them, seeing all the congregation was holy (Num 16:3). “You take too much state, too much power, too much honor, too much holiness upon you; for what are you more than others that you take so much upon you?” And so Ahab’s false prophets fell foul on good Micaiah, paying of him with blows for want of better reasons (1Ki 22:10-26). Yea, Paul, that great Apostle of the Gentiles, had his ministry undermined and his reputation blasted by false teachers: “For his letters, say they, are weighty and powerful; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible” (2Co 10:10). They rather contemn him than admire him. They look upon him as a dunce rather than a doctor. And the same hard measure had our Lord Jesus from the Scribes and Pharisees, who labored as for life to build their own credit upon the ruins of His reputation. And never did the devil drive a more full trade this way than he does in these days (Mat 27:63). Oh! The dirt, the filth, the scorn that is thrown upon those of whom the world is not worthy…

The third character: False teachers are venters(3) of the devices and visions of their own heads and hearts. “Then the LORD said unto me, The prophets prophesy lies in my name: I sent them not, neither have I commanded them, neither spake unto them: they prophesy unto you a false vision and divination, and a thing of nought, and the deceit of their heart” (Jer 14:14). “Thus saith the LORD of hosts, Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you: they make you vain: they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD” (Jer 23:16). Are there not multitudes in this nation whose visions are but golden delusions, lying vanities, brainsick fantasies? These are Satan’s great benefactors and such as divine justice will hang up in hell as the greatest malefactors, if the Physician of souls does not prevent it.

The fourth character: False teachers easily pass over the great and weighty things of both Law and Gospel and stand most upon those things that are of the least moment and concernment to the souls of men. “Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned: From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling; Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm” (1Ti 1:5-7). “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone” (Mat 23:23). False teachers are nice(4) in the lesser things of the law and as negligent in the greater. “If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself” (1Ti 6:3-5)…The earth groans to bear them, and hell is fitted for them (Mat 24:32).

The fifth character: False teachers cover and color their dangerous principles and soul-impostures with very fair speeches and plausible pretences, with high notions and golden expressions. Many in these days are bewitched and deceived by the magnificent words, lofty strains, and stately terms of deceivers, viz., illumination, revelation, deification, fiery triplicity(5), etc. As strumpets paint their faces and deck and perfume their beds, the better to allure and deceive simple souls, so false teachers will put a great deal of paint and garnish upon their most dangerous principles and blasphemies that they may the better de-ceive and delude poor ignorant souls. They know sugared poison goes down sweetly. They wrap up their pernicious, soul-killing pills in gold. Weigh the Scriptures in the margin…

The sixth character: False teachers strive more to win over men to their opinions than to better them in their conversations. “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves” (Mat 24:17). They busy themselves most about men’s heads. Their work is not to better men’s hearts and mend their lives. In this, they are very much like their father the dev-il, who will spare no pains to gain proselytes.

The seventh character: False teachers make merchandise of their followers: “But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time linger-eth not, and their damnation slumbereth not” (2Pe 2:1-3). They eye your goods more than your good and mind more the serving of themselves than the saving of your souls. So they may have your substance, they care not though Satan has your souls (Rev 18:11-13). That they may the better pick your purse, they will hold forth such principles as are very indulgent to the flesh. False teachers are the great worshippers of the golden calf (Jer 6:13).

Now, by these characters you may know them, and so shun them, and deliver your souls out of their dangerous snares; which that you may, my prayers shall meet yours at the throne of grace.

ENDNOTES:

1 dalliance – light, irreverent action.
2 chirurgeons – surgeons.
3 venters – those who utter or give vent to erroneous doctrines.
4 nice – precise.
5 triplicity – one of four groups of the zodiac where each group consists of three signs separated from each other by 120 degrees.

From “Precious Remedies against Satan’s Devices” in The Complete Works of Thomas Brooks, Vol. 1, reprinted by The Banner of Truth Trust.

Thomas Brooks (1608–1680): Congregational preacher and author; buried in Bunhill Fields, London, UK.

Copyright Chapel Library. Used by permission. For other excellent conservative titles in print, eBooks, and online, contact Chapel Library, www.chapellibrary.orgchapel@mountzion.org; 2603 W. Wright St., Pensacola FL 32505.


Are There Many Races or One?

$
0
0


5755781638_babel_super-40186926943_xlarge

By Voddie Baucham

Are there many races, or just one? What role does or belief about Darwinian evolution play in our understanding of race? Is Darwinian evolution inherently racist? These are just a few of the questions addressed in this message.

Racism has a variety of root causes. However, none of these causes is more sinister than the misuse of Genesis. Not only does a proper understanding of this text disprove racist assertions made by some biblical exegetes, it also cuts straight to the heart of the Darwinian brand of racism that gave rise to such atrocities as the Holocaust. Though there are many ethnicities, this message argues that all human beings actually form a single race.

Listen to the Audio sermon !!  

Download: 2008-05-11-a-the-table-of-nations-voddie-baucham-525091133123.mp3


Join me if you will in Genesis 10 and as we said when we thought about preaching through the first 11 chapters of Genesis there were several places that sort of gave us pause. And one of the places was Genesis 10.

What do you do when you get to Genesis 10 and the table of nations?

But we are committed to systematic exposition and one of the things that means is just

like in our reading of Scripture. I am sure if you are a guest with us and you haven’t been with us and you don’t really know about what we do and what we are committed to in worship, well, one of the things we are committed to is that the Bible says to give

attention to the public reading of Scripture. And so we read systematically through Scripture. And we will read in the Old Testament and we will read in the New Testament and we will take a book and we will read through the book. And so right now we are reading through Exodus.

And a lot of people sit there and they have never been with us and we are in Exodus 26 and they are going, “Huh,” wondering how they are going to tie this in to everything that they are doing in the…

We don’t tie it in. We are just committed to the systematic reading of Scripture. And if we believe that all Scripture is God breathed and profitable for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness so that the man of God may be adequate and equipped for every good work,”1 then what part of Scripture would be inappropriate to read in worship?  Well, none.

1  See 2 Timothy 3:16-17.

Do we really believe that?  Well, most times we don’t. That’s why most of us have never been in a church where Exodus 26 has ever been read. Amen?  But we read systematically through the Scripture. We read, you know, Revelation, the next week we will read Revelation 22 and then we will find another New Testament book and we will read through it from the beginning to the end.

We preach systematically. So right now we are preaching Genesis one through 11. Most times you don’t tackle Genesis chapter 10, the table of nations, lists of names. Amen, Hallelujah, Praise the Lord. Make you just want to get up and shout and do the Hallelujah Holy Ghost dance, all right, reading lists of names.

No.

But if we are committed to systematic exposition and we look at the Scriptures as a whole, the question is:  God put Genesis chapter 10 in here for a reason. Can we, in light of what we have taught all the way through Genesis chapters one through nine and in

light of what comes up in Genesis chapter 11, can we understand how Genesis chapter 10 fits into God’s redemptive plan?  And the answer, I believe, is yes.

Let’s read together, shall we?  Or I will read it.

These are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Sons were born to them after the flood. The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras.2

By the way, we have a lot of expecting mothers here in the church with us this morning and as we go through here feel free to just dive in and grab any one of these names.

The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah. The sons of Javan: Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. From these the coastland peoples spread in their lands, each with his own language, by their clans, in their nations. 3

And so now we see the sons of Japheth going off to these coastal regions.

The sons of Ham: Cush, Egypt, Put, and Canaan. The sons of Cush: Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah, and Sabteca. The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan. Cush fathered Nimrod; he was the first on earth to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD. Therefore it is said, “Like Nimrod a mighty hunter before the LORD.”

The beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in

the land of Shinar. From that land he went into Assyria and built Nineveh,

2  Genesis 10:1-2.

3  Genesis 10:3-5.

Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and  Resen between Nineveh and Calah; that is the great city. Egypt fathered Ludim, Anamim, Lehabim, Naphtuhim, Pathrusim, Casluhim (from whom the Philistines came), and Caphtorim.

 And so now we have seen the Philistines as well. We recognize them.

Canaan fathered Sidon his firstborn and Heth, and the Jebusites, the Amorites, the Girgashites, the Hivites, the Arkites, the Sinites, the Arvadites, the Zemarites, and the Hamathites. Afterward the clans of the Canaanites dispersed. And the territory of the Canaanites extended from Sidon in the direction of Gerar as far as Gaza, and in the direction of Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim, as far as Lasha. These are the sons of Ham, by their clans, their languages, their lands, and their nations.5

And so now we see the sons of Ham, much more prolific these sons of Ham. We have one who has gone sort of coastal and another one who has moved in a sort of southerly direction.

To Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the elder brother of Japheth, children were born. The sons of Shem: Elam, Asshur, Arpachshad, Lud, and Aram.  The sons of Aram: Uz, Hul, Gether, and Mash. Arpachshad fathered Shelah; and Shelah fathered Eber. To Eber were born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg, for in his days the earth was divided, and his brother’s name was Joktan. Joktan fathered Almodad, Sheleph, Hazarmaveth, Jerah,  Hadoram, Uzal, Diklah, Obal, Abimael, Sheba, Ophir, Havilah, and Jobab; all these were the sons of Joktan. The territory in which they lived extended from Mesha in the direction of Sephar to the hill country of the east.  These are the sons of Shem, by their clans, their languages, their lands, and their nations.6

And so now we have Shem taking off in an easterly direction. “These are the clans of the sons of Noah, according to their genealogies, in their nations, and from these the nations spread abroad on the earth after the flood.7

Now here is the question. Do we believe that?  That is the question. Do we believe that? When we look at the table of nations what the table of nations suggests is this. All the different people groups on earth are derived from the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham and Japheth. Do we believe that?

4  Genesis 10:6-14.

5  Genesis 10:15-20.

6  Genesis 10:21-31.

7  Genesis 10:32.

Now, don’t answer that too quickly because you may be surprised by the answer, because for the most part we don’t believe that. We don’t believe that we all are of common descent and of common origin. Most of us when we think and ask ourselves the question about the different people groups and from where they are derived and how they are derived, we ask ourselves that question from a perspective that is given to us by our culture.

So as we think about this issue of nations and the origin of nations, we have been conditioned to think this way. There are multiple races of men who come from multiple origins. We believe this because that is what we have been taught. And there are several reasons that we have been taught to believe this. But all of the sudden we get back to Genesis 10 and the table of nations and we have to ask ourselves a question.

How do we get multiple races of people if everybody goes back to Shem, Ham and Japheth?  How was Noah able to have children who were multiple races?  How did that happen? And if Noah didn’t have children who were multiple races, where did the multiple races of people come from?

Interestingly enough, there is a premise in the question that is false. And here is the false premise. The false premise is that there are multiple races of people. There is only race. There has always been one race.  There will always be one race. All descended from Noah who was descended from Adam. There is but one race.

Did you hear me? There is but one race.

Now as I say that I say it over and over again so that it will wash over us because if you will remember we always talk about Aristotle’s famous question: Does a fish know he is wet?  The answer, of course, is no. A fish doesn’t know he is wet, not until you get him out of the water. And the fact of the matter is, we have been conditioned by our culture for a number of reasons to believe that there are multiple races of people.

I have people ask me all the time. Is your church interracial?

To which I always respond, oh, absolutely not.  We only accept humans as members.

No, no, no. Wouldn’t dare, wouldn’t dare have anyone who was not human as a member of our church. We have got a little dog who hangs around up here in the parking log, you know. He is wanting membership. He is trying to get membership, but no, no, no. This is a humans only congregation.

I have people a lot asking me a lot how I feel about interracial marriage or interracial adoption. To which, again, I respond: No, I do not believe in interracial marriage. Absolutely, not.  I am against interracial marriage. My children may only marry humans. Amen. That is all. Don’t you bring a non human into my house trying to get my blessing to go and get married. All right?  There is but one race and one race only.

Listen to this from Webster’s 1828 dictionary. I am sorry some of this won’t be up for you, for some of it is quite visual. Webster defines race as this, “The lineage of a family or continued series of descendants from a parent who is called a stock.”

A race is the series of descendants indefinitely, thus all mankind are called the race of Adam. By definition all mankind are called the race of Adam. Many races or one.

Listen to Paul in Acts 17:26. “And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place.”8

He is hearkening back to Genesis chapter 10. God made from one man every nation of men. There are not multiple races of men. There is but one race of man. What we have in Genesis chapter 10 is not the table of races, but the table of nations. That is what we have in Genesis 10, single parentage, single lineages, not races.

By the way, listen to this. A geneticist and a computer scientist and a geologist all at Yale sort of got together to do some number crunching and some figuring based on what we know of genealogy. And here is what they discovered. You would have to go back in time only 2000 to 5000 years and probably on the low side of that range to find

somebody who could count every person alive today as a descendant.

These are not Christians, by the way. These are evolutionary biologists. These are evolutionary scientists who by their computations have said you only have to go back between 2000 and 4000 years to find a person from whom all of us are commonly descended, 2000 to 5000 years. Well the flood happened about 4000 years ago, interestingly enough. It fits right in there.

But wait. There is more.  Furthermore, if you go back a little bit further, about 5000 to

7000 years ago—by the way, I believe the earth is only about 6000 years old. I know that makes me a freak. Amen? But I believe Genesis. I do.  I also believe science. And I believe the scientific evidence points to the earth being only around 6000 years old, not billions and billions of years old.

But these evolutionary scientists say, furthermore, if you go back a little further, about 5000 to 7000 years ago everybody living today has exactly the same set of ancestors. I wonder who that might be?  That would be Adam and Eve. One race or multiple races? Which is it?

Our culture says there are multiple races. The Bible says that there is but one. Which do we say?  For most of my life I have believed that there were multiple races. For most of my life I believed that. Even as a new believer I believed that.  I became a believer and it didn’t automatically change every aspect of my thinking over night. No.  I was still swimming in the stream of this culture and believed with every fiber of my being that 8  Acts 17:26. there were multiple races of people and that you could determine those multiple races of people by external characteristics like skin tone, like hair type, like shape of face and eyes and think of things of that nature, but that there were multiple races of people.

Why do we doubt the one race hypothesis?  Two reasons mainly. One reason is evolution. We doubt the one race hypothesis because we are bathed in this theory of evolution. We believe this theory of evolution. Everywhere we go it is assumed that man evolved. And evolutionary thinking has thought for a long time that there are multiple races of people.

The second reason that we fail to believe this one race hypothesis is because of Racism. It is because of Racism.  It is because of racial prejudice. And that category of race and that category of thinking about people as races of people is actually Racist in itself. That category that goes back to Genesis chapter 10 and somehow believes that there was a mutation that took place and that there were certain mutant races that came as a result of that, that is Racism. Or that idea that goes back even further to Adam and says that there was somehow a subadamic race, that there is Adam and the people who descended from Adam, but then there are other people who did not descend from Adam but they descended from some subadamic race, some race not identified with Adam. That is Racism.

As we look at Genesis 10 I want you to understand that this gets to the core of who we are as people. This gets to the core of how we relate to one another. This gets to the core of how we treat one another and this gets to the core of assumptions and prejudices with which all of us struggle, all of us.

Here is what I want to do in the rest of the time that we have together.  I want to show you how this struggle has come about. I want to show you the scars that this struggle has left and then we will look back at a better way to think about issues regarding so called race and how it is we must address this because I don’t think we understand how we have been affected.

First of all, evolution. Listen to this from Paula Weston. “The increase an spread of evolutionist doctrine has much to answer for in relation to the way people often treat each other. Sadly, people rarely recognize that the prejudices which have slowly become ingrained in their psyche have often been a result directly or indirectly of evolutionary thinking.”

We don’t know how much we have been messed up.

Listen to this from Stephen J. Gould in his book Ontogeny and Phylogeny. He was a Harvard professor, by the way. “Biological arguments for Racism may have been common before 1859.”

By the way, 1859 is when we got this earth shattering book here, The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin, 1859, The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection.

There is an alternate title to this book, by the way. Most of people don’t put the whole title of the book on the cover of the book. The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection or The preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life. A foundational book for modern Racism right here. I recommend you read it and its companion, The Descent of Man.  I recommend you read that because people who are basing their understanding of the world on Darwinian evolutionary concepts have no idea that at its core Darwinian thinking is Racist.

Listen to this. “The widely held view was that Blacks evolved from strong, but less intelligent gorillas. The Orientals evolved from the orangutan and Whites evolved from the most intelligent of all primates, the chimpanzees.”

That is Darwinian evolutionary thinking. We all came from apes. It is just some of us came from more intelligent apes than others.

Not Genesis chapter 10, the table of nations, no, no, no. Not that. Not all with one common ancestor. No, no, no. Not that. Some came from big strong gorillas, others came from orangutans and others came from the intelligent chimpanzee.

Here is one I wish you could see. But there is a popular evolutionary picture and you have seen it. You know, it starts with, you know, this knuckle dragging gorilla and then he begins to stand more upright and eventually at the end of it is man walking in his fully evolved form. Here is what a lot of people don’t know.

There are six drawings. And, by the way, it is a drawing. There are six drawings on that evolutionary picture and that evolutionary chart, this Darwinian evolutionary chart. The first two drawings are very apelike. The third drawing is supposed to be this kind of missing link kind of maybe Lucy or one of these fossils. The fourth drawing is a Black man. The fifth drawing is an Asian man and the final drawing is an Anglo Saxon man.

And so the teaching of Darwinian Evolution as depicted in this drawing is that as people became more evolved they became less dark. So the darker you are, the less human you are.

How many of us had that drawing in our science books?  That drawing is often still in people’s science books. And it impacts us. That drawing is incompatible with the teaching of Genesis chapter 10. According to Genesis chapter 10 we all have common ancestry and there is but one race and one race only. According to Darwinian Evolution I am darker because I am less evolved than my lighter brethren.

Do you think that this has not affected us? Listen to this. One man’s journey.

David’s father, a geologist, tried to reconcile evolution with Christianity—his father was Methodist—by concluding that evolution was the means God used to create life. This background set the ground work for David’s later acceptance of Darwinism. As he read more and more on the scientific issue of race he became torn between his religion and science.

David was doing his research on Darwinism while he was attending a Church of Christ school in New Orleans. As a result of his study of Evolution, David openly challenged his teachers discussing his evolving ideas about the origin of humans and their implications for Racism.

When endeavoring to combine his Darwinist, Racist beliefs with Christianity, David used many of the same rationalizations used by theistic evolutionists to rationalize the plain statements in Genesis.

David eventually sided with Darwinism and rejected Creationism. He concluded that with each passing day more evidence emerges of the dynamic genetically born physical and physiological differences between the races.

So ended his fleeting commitment to orthodox Christianity even though he still peppers his writings with religious phrases such as, “If I can move our people one inch toward God my life will have been worthwhile.”

His life tells a very different story. In short, after his acceptance of Darwinism David Duke unabashedly classified both Europeans and Asian races as higher levels of human evolution than the African race.

Who is David Duke?  You remember the grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. He ran for Congress. What were his ideals based on?  A rejection of Genesis 10 in favor of Racist, Darwinian, Evolutionist ideas about who we are as people.

Do we look in Genesis 10 and see some of us?  Or we do we look in Genesis 10 and see all of us?

What about this Racist idea?

Listen to this. A higher race subjects to itself a lower race. A right which we see in nature and which can be regarded as the sole conceivable right. It is the sole conceivable right of a more evolved race to subject a less evolved race.

Who said that?  Adolf Hitler said that. That’s who. That is who said that and that is what he believed. But that was then. Right?  I mean, come on. That was Darwin in the 1850s over in Europe.

Come on, that was Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime. Certainly that was other individuals in other cultures and not our own, really. Nobody here in America.

Oda Benga was an African Pygmy. He was captured and brought to the United States in the 20th century, not the 19th century, not the 18th century. Oda Benga was captured and brought to the United States in the 20th century. He eventually ended up in a zoo. Yes, in a zoo.

Listen to the heading of one paper when he first premiered in the zoo. “Bushmen shares cage with Bronx Park ape.”

Oh, did I tell you? This was New York, not Alabama and this was in 1906.

Listen to the statements. There was always a crowd before the cage most of the time roaring with laughter. And from almost every corner of the garden could be heard the question: Where is the Pygmy?

The answer was:  In the monkey house. That was September of 1906.

How about this?  We believe that the White Anglo Saxon Germanic kindred people to be God’s true literal children of Israel. Only this race fulfills every detail of biblical prophecy and world history concerning Israel and continues in these latter days to be heirs and possessors of the covenants, prophecies, promises and blessings Yahweh God made to Israel.

Where do you find that?  Oh, the statement of faith of the Ku Klux Klan. That is how they interpret Genesis.

How about the Christian Identity movement? We believe that the man Adam is the father of the white race only.

How about Mormonism? We know the circumstances under which the posterity of Cain and later Ham were cursed with what we call Negroid racial characteristics.

Is it just the Mormons? How about the Jehovah’s Witnesses? In July 1929 in their magazine The Watchtower you find this statement. “The curse that Noah pronounced upon Cainan was the origin of the black race.”

Is it just the Darwinists? Is it just the cultists?  No. It has also been prevalent in the Church among orthodox Christians. For example, in 1794 a denomination was born, the African Methodist Episcopal denomination.  Where was the African Methodist Episcopal denomination born? Out of the Methodist Church. Why?  Was the AME Church born out of the Methodist Church in 1794?  Because of Racism within Methodism that did not allow certain races entry into their churches. So they formed the African Methodist Episcopal Church. How about Southern Baptists? Certainly not us, right?  The Southern Baptist Convention was established in 1845. Why? Because of a dispute. What was the dispute? Can a man who owns slaves be commissioned as a missionary?

So at the triennial convention in 1845 some Baptists from the South sent a man up as a candidate to be a missionary sent out by the convention. They rejected him on the grounds that he was a slave holder. Because they did that in 1845 the Southern Baptist Convention split and was thereby born.

There was not a public acknowledgement or repentance from this until the 150th anniversary of the SBC in 1995. According to one survey as late as 1968 only 11% of Southern Baptist Churches allowed non Whites to be members, only 11%.

Listen to this. How about the Fundamentalists? What about them?  Listen to this from John Rice who is the founder of the magazine The Sword of the Lord. “Socially it is better for both Negroes and Whites to run with their own kind and intermarry with their own kind. The mixing of races widely differing is almost never wise. Thus, if a girl would do wrong to marry a Negro boy, she would be wrong to keep company with him, mixing regularly with him in social life.”

Were those the only Fundamentalists who thought that way?  Well, this one

Fundamentalist university who banned interracial dating. They lifted the ban, however, in

2000, in 2000 they lifted the ban. Why?  This Fundamentalist college, university lifted

the ban on what they called interracial dating. By the way, how can you interracial dating if you believe, according to Genesis 10, that is but one race?  You can’t.

So this Fundamentalist school lifted the ban in interracial dating in 2000. Why? Because George W. Bush was running for president and had a debate on their campus. The press was so upset with Mr. Bush for going to Bob Jones University that they raised a furor. And it was only then in an effort not to hurt Mr. Bush’s campaign that Bob Jones University changed their stance on interracial dating in 2000.

Is it just on the non dark skinned side?  No. Listen to this from Elijah Mohammed, one of the founders of the Nation of Islam and his book Message to the Black Man in America, “The origin of all sin, the origin of murder, the origin of lying are deceptions originating with the creators of evil and injustice, the White race.  Even today they like climbing and jumping. The monkeys are from them. Before their time there were no such things as monkeys, apes and swine.”

So the other side comes back and argues, “No, no, no. We are not the ones who were descended from the apes.  In fact, the apes descended from you.”

Dueling, Darwinian Racism. But Genesis chapter 10 says Noah had three sons. They were Shem. They were Ham. And they were Japheth. These three sons went to different regions of the world and eventually all people groups come from those three sons.

So what do we learn from Genesis chapter 10? What does the Bible teach us?  Number one, the Bible teaches us that we are one in Adam. Amen. Hallelujah. Praise the Lord. There is one race and Adam is the father of that race. Eve is the mother of that race.

Secondly, the Bible teaches us in Genesis chapter nine and Genesis chapter 10 that we are one in Noah. After the flood there was a preservation of the human race and it was through Noah and his sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth.

The Bible also teaches us that we are one in Christ. Galatians chapter three and verse 28. Turn there with me if you will. And it reads:

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.9

We are one in Adam. We are one in Noah. We are one in Christ. And we will be one in glory.

Turn with me, if you will, to Revelation chapter seven.

After this I looked, and behold, a great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, with palm branches in their hands, and crying out with a loud voice, “Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb!”10

To whose God? Our God. Which nation’s God?  Our God. Which people’s God?  Our God. Which tone’s God?  Our God.

That is whose God. One in Adam, one in Noah, one in Christ, one in glory.

So what does this mean? Here is what I want you to understand. Make this observation and then we will close with a couple of applications. We all descended from common ancestors. We know this from the Scriptures. We also know this scientifically. There is one race, but there are many nations, ethnic groups.  Where do we get that term from?

9  Galatians 3:28-29.

10  Revelation 7:9-10.

If you are a member of this church and you have been through new member’s orientation, you know the one Greek phrase that everyone is required to know if you are going to be a member of Grace Family Baptist Church. That one Greek phrase is what? panta ta eynh (pan-ta ta eth-nay).  Where is that from? The Great Commission. Go and make disciples of panta ta eynh (pan-ta ta eth-nay), every ethnicity, every people group.

There is but one race. There are many different ethnicities.

Thirdly, understand this. There is less than a 0.2% genetic difference between any two people in this room. You pick any two people in this room at random and there is less than a 0.2% genetic difference between any two people in this room.

Which means, fourthly, we all share the same genes. Amen.

There used to be laws against intermarriage based on the fact that if people were to marry from differing—quote, unquote—races, that there would develop some mongrel race, that there would be some kind of freakish development as the result of the intermixing between those individuals.

There is less than a zero point two percent genetic difference between any two people in this room and, news flash, whatever you think you are, you are that and a whole lot more. Amen?

Finally, here is what I also interesting. We are all the same color. We are all the same color.

Well, no we are not.

Well, yeah, actually we are. The color in your skin and the color in my skin all comes from the same chemical.  It is called melanin. There aren’t different colors of melanin. There are just different degrees of melanin in the skin. People are darker or lighter because they have more or less melanin in their skin. That’s all.  It is all the same color. Some people just have more of that color in their skin. And here is what is interesting about the whole deal.

If we had started with two individuals, Adam and Eve, who just completely lacked melanin and were what we call White, we would not have gotten all the different colors of people or shades shall I say of people. Or if we started with two people, Adam and Eve and they were individuals with as much melanin as me and they were all what we call Black, we would not have gotten all the different shades of people. However, if

Adam and Eve were what we call middle brown, then guess what?  From a middle brown couple you could get every shade represented in this room and only from a middle brown couple.

So, news flash, Javier is the closest thing to what Adam looked like as it relates to melanin in his skin.

I was talking to Javier about this earlier. I didn’t just spring that on him, by the way.  I told him I was going to do that. And when I told him I was going to do that, Javier just sort of smiled and he said, “You know what is interesting?  In my country in Venezuela, we have people, we have couples, you know, and the couple will both be the sort of same complexion like my complexion and they will have kids and some of them will be real, real, real light and some of them will be real, real, real dark.

By the way, that is not new. That is what happened to Noah. He had some real light descendants, some middle brown descendants and some dark brown descendants and they are all over the globe.

And, by the way, anybody have a pure bred dog?  Pure breds don’t live as long. They got more medical problems. My brother who are incredibly light they got issues. Sun just doesn’t… you know, they get melanomas and all this sort of stuff. Just not a good thing. My brethren who are really, really dark, we have a tendency to have vitamin D deficiencies. Why?  Because we are blocking out more of the sun.

So now what?

If Genesis 10 teaches us that there is but one race but many ethnicities, what are the implications for you and me and the way we live our lives?

Number one, we need to celebrate our oneness in Adam and Noah and Christ and in glory. Amen?  We need to celebrate our oneness.

Secondly, we need to recognize all racism as sin, even that in ourselves. All of it.

Are you worried or perhaps disinclined about your children coming home with someone of another skin color when it comes to marriage?  Why?  Why?  Because a fish doesn’t know he is wet, that’s why.  We all struggle with that.

Thirdly, stop using race as a category. If you believe Genesis 10, if you believe Genesis one, why would we ever use race as a category? This race, that race, the other race.

For those of you who know me I have just a few pet peeves, not a lot, but we have all got a few pet peeves.  One of my pet peeves is I despise being called African American. I hate being called African American. I get angry at being called African American. Did I say I despise being called African American?  I believe it is a racist term.

First of all, why do I have to be hyphenated at all?  Amen. Hallelujah. Praise the Lord. Why are we hyphenating and dividing ourselves in the first place.  But I mean, ok. I am African American. Ok, that’s fine. Let’s examine this to see if it is an appropriate term.

I am African American. Great.  If someone is from Egypt do we call them an African American?  No.  Well, then the term is not appropriate. Egypt is in Africa.  Libya is in Africa. So if we are going to call someone an African American because their skin looks like mine, why wouldn’t we call an Egyptian with lighter skin who is actually Arabic in his ethnicity an African American?  Why?  Because African American doesn’t mean what we like to say it means. It is a racist term.

Well, ok, fine. Then we won’t use African American. Well, yeah we will. We will use

African American because are still talking about people from Africa.

Ok, that’s fine, but we already established that the Egyptian, the Egyptian is from Africa as well.

Well, we use Asian American. Is that appropriate?  Well, let’s examine it. Asian American. When we use Asian American we usually talk about people who are from Korea or Japan or from, you know, China.  But guess what else is Asian?  India and Pakistan? And do we call Indians and Pakistanis Asian Americans?  No we don’t. Why? Because the term is inappropriate. We don’t mean what we say.

Someone from Russia who is from the southern part of Russia are they are European American or are they an Asian American?  By the way someone from the Middle East, what are they?  Middle Eastern American?

Well, no, they are Arab American. No, not necessarily because people from Iran are not

Arabs. They are Persians.

The terms don’t work. That is why I despise the terms.

What do we call someone from Venezuela?  A South American American?  That would make some one from Mexico a North American American.

Do you see how ridiculous this terminology is?  The terminology is born out of our racist preconditioning.

Who am I?  I am what C.S. Lewis calls, “Son of Adam.” Amen?  I love that term. That Chronicles of Narnia term, sons of Adam. That is what I am. I am a son of Adam. That’s what you are, sons and daughters of Adam.

Here is what I love. We have looked at a lot of documents and read a lot of statements that weren’t very attractive, but are there any that get it right?

Our confession of faith is the London Baptist Confession of 1689. Listen to the London Baptist Confession in the chapter on marriage. “It is lawful for all sorts of people to marry who are able with judgment to give their consent. Yet it is the duty of Christians to marry in the Lord and therefore such as profess the true religion should not marry with

infidels or idolaters, neither should such as are godly be unequally yoked by marrying with such as are wicked in their life or maintain damnable heresy.

1689. The understood what the Bible taught. What did the Bible teach?  The Bible taught we are one in Adam, we are one in Noah, we are one in Christ.

When you are looking for somebody to marry, don’t be like man who looks on the outside. You be like God who judges the heart.

[?] my son or daughter to come home with somebody who is deep, dark, chocolate brown, but doesn’t know Jesus from the man in the moon or somebody who hails from somewhere like Hong Kong or Singapore or Brazil or England who loves God and has a multi generational vision for seeing to it that my children’s children are raised in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. Which one is it?

Christ came to redeem his people in Adam, in Noah and he has but one people. We are but one Church.  We are but one race. There has always been but one race.  All of us has been marred by the racism in our culture, every last one of us. Don’t think for a minute that you have gotten away from it unscathed. You haven’t. You have bathed in it for years and years and years. And when you look at people you make snap judgments. You do.  You do.

Somebody walks in the door and immediately we look at that individual and if that individual has brown skin we find one of our brown skinned families in the church to introduce that individual to. Why?  Because we think brown skinned people are going to have more in common with brown skinned people and we want that brown skin person to know, hey, we got brown skinned people in our church, too.

If you can’t say amen, you ought to say ouch. Because we do it all the time. Why? Because a fish doesn’t know he is wet, that’s why. That’s why. A fish doesn’t know he is wet.

And you and I have no idea that though we are followers of Christ and have been redeemed, that the area of racism and prejudice is something that needs to be scrubbed from our souls, from every last one of us.

My prayer is that this church would always be a church that holds up high the banner of Christ, period, end of discussion. And if you can unite around Christ you can unite with us. I don’t care if you are pink, green or purple. If you can unite around Christ you can unite with us. But if you have a problem with accepting other people as one race, you are not welcome here. Repent. Fall on your face before our Jewish, middle brown Savior and beg him to cleanse you with his blood that looks just like yours.

HL : http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=525091133123


WARNING ! WARNING !! Todd Bentley is coming to serve Satan in South Africa

$
0
0
todd-bentley-demon-opti

Tattooed preacher who ‘cures’ cancer by kicking people in the face banned from entering the UK, August 2012.

It has come to our attention that Todd Bentley will be in South Africa from April 5 to April 28 , 2013.  The reason for his visit is to lead many astray onto the wide road leading to destruction.  His visit follows  closely on the heels of Rick Joyner last year, who joined hands with Angus Buchan read more here Warning! Rick Joyner to visit South Africa and Join hands with Angus Buchan. Also see here Angus Buchan: Evangelist or Revivalist?

Further please read Oom (Uncle) Angus Buchan from the Mighty Men Revivals and of Faith like Potatoes fame at the The Apostolic Prophetic Conference of Neville Norden’s church Lewende Woord. We  also previously reported on Gretha Wiid from the Worthy Women Revivals,  Buchan’s South African female understudy.

South African authorities should take an example from the UK, by banning this man from my beloved South Africa.

What does the Bible say about false “profits”  like Bentley and the likes ?

Matthew 7:15-20 KJV Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. (16) Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? (17) Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. (18) A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. (19) Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. (20) Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

The Bible also teaches it is impossible to  renew these type of men back to repentance.

Hebrews 6:4-8 KJV For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, (5) And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, (6) If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. (7) For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God: (8) But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.

Hebrews 6:3-6

“If They Shall Fall Away…”

Salvation is by God’s free and sovereign grace alone. The sinner’s only hope before God is the blood atonement and imputed righteousness of Christ. That salvation which God gives to and works in his people is eternal salvation. All true faith is permanent, persevering faith. However, there is a faith, which is a satanic delusion.

Carnal Security

Here is a terribly sobering fact plainly revealed in Holy Scripture. We will be wise to lay it to heart. — It is quite possible for men and women to have an undisturbed peace, unshaken assurance, and unquestioned security with regard to their eternal destiny, and yet have no saving interest in Christ. If that fact is not alarming to you, it should be. The Lord God sounds this blaring warning by his prophet Obadiah: – “Woe unto them that are at ease in Zion!”

Satan is a crafty, subtle foe. He knows that the surest way to keep sinners from the saving knowledge of Christ is to give them some satisfying, conscience soothing substitute, some religious experience, or feelings, or gifts, or knowledge by which they may convince themselves that the grace of God is surely theirs.

Do not be deceived. Many have gifts who have no grace. Multitudes profess faith they do not possess. Countless thousands enjoy peace who do not have pardon. Hoards of men and women, orthodox to the core, are yet without life before God. There is a form of godliness possessed by men who deny the power of it. Many have a name that they live who are yet dead in trespasses and in sins. Hell is bulging with eternally damned souls who went to that place of torment assured that they were on the road to heaven, with a Bible in their hands, a song in their hearts, and a profession on their lips. At the time when Lot’s wife felt most secure, she went to hell! When all the other apostles were fearful, saying, “Lord, is it I?” Judas was perfectly confident.

Examine Yourself

There is nothing on this earth more fearful than the carnal security of religion without Christ. Let us bring our faith to the Word of God and examine it. May it please God to search our hearts and let us see if we have the faith of God’s elect (2Co_13:5; 2Pe_1:10; Psa_139:23-24). If our faith is the faith of God’s elect, if it is sound, if it is a God given faith, examination will only strengthen it, and cause us to cling more firmly to Christ. If our faith is false, examination may expose it. If we have built for ourselves a refuge of lies, in which we are trying to hide from God, may he graciously destroy our false refuge and hide us in Christ by his almighty grace.

Hebrews 6:4-6

A Mere Form of Godliness

In these verses the Spirit of God shows us plainly that there are some people who have what appears to be heavenly gifts who have no grace in their hearts. Multitudes have religion who do not have Christ. Many there are who enjoy great experiences who have never experienced grace. Many have a form of godliness who know nothing of the power of God by which sinners are born again. These verses speak of people who have experienced much, professed much, and demonstrated much in religion. Yet, they have no saving union with Christ. They have faith; but it is a false faith. They have repentance; but it is a repentance that needs to be repented of. They have experienced religion; but they have not experienced the grace of God. Beware of resting your soul upon experiences, gifts, and outward works of religion. To build your house upon these things is to build upon sand. It is possible to be ranked with the most spiritual, most gifted, most zealous men and women in the world, and yet go to hell in the end (Mat_7:21-23). Is your faith the faith of God’s elect; or is it a false faith?

  • False faith may be greatly enlightened and knowledgeable of gospel truth. Judas was. True faith receives the love of the Truth (2Th_2:10).
  • False faith excites the affections, like the stony ground hearers of the parable, and causes people to spring up like shooting stars, only to fade quickly. True faith is the abiding, growing gift of God.
  • False faith reforms the outward life and causes people to live better before men. True faith arises from a regenerate heart and causes people to seek the will and glory of God.
  • False faith may speak well of Christ, as the Jews did. True faith loves Christ.
  • False faith confesses sins, like King Saul. True faith confesses sin, like David.
  • False faith may humble itself in sackcloth and ashes, like Ahab. True faith humbles itself before God.
  • False faith may repent in terror, like Esau and Judas. True faith repents in contrition, being convinced of God’s way of salvation in Christ (Joh_16:8-11).
  • False faith often performs religious works very diligently. Saul of Tarsus did. True faith is a faith, which “worketh by love.”
  • False faith is sometimes very generous and charitable (Ananias and Sapphira). True faith causes ransomed sinners to be generous, willingly, constrained only by love and gratitude.
  • False faith may tremble at the Word of God, like Felix. True faith trembles and bows.
  • False faith often experiences much in religion. True faith trusts no experience, no matter how great, and looks to Christ alone.
  • False faith often enjoys great religious privileges, like Lot’s wife. True faith places no confidence in the flesh.
  • False faith may preach, perform miracles, and cast out demons, like Judas. True faith rejoices in having one’s name written in heaven.
  • False faith often attains high office in the church, like Diotrephes, and walks with great preachers, as Demas walked with Paul. True faith is honored to keep the doors of God’s house and walk with Christ.
  • False faith may be peaceful and carnally secure, like the five foolish virgins. True faith presumes nothing, but looks constantly to Christ.

Hebrews 6:4-6

Religious But Lost

Men and women often feel, experience, and do much in religion who never experience God’s saving grace. Neither emotional experience, nor orthodoxy of creed, nor reformation of life is necessarily a token of grace. Heb_6:4-6 speaks of such people. Look at what these people have experienced.

Enlightened

They were once enlightened to an understanding of Gospel truth. These were heretics. These are not Arminians, free-willers, papists, or Hindus. These people know the truth, at least mentally. They intellectually perceive and submit to the doctrinal truths of the gospel. To them, the doctrines of the gospel are logical and reasonable. They accept them as facts plainly revealed in the Word of God.

The fact is – The natural man can see and understand any doctrine taught in Holy Scripture. He cannot see the glory of God in the face of Christ; but he can see and glory in doctrine. He cannot love Christ; but he can love doctrine. The unsaved man may be a better theologian than the believer. But the poor, uneducated believer knows and loves what the unregenerate man never can. The believer knows, loves, trusts, and rejoices in Christ.

Tasted Heavenly Gifts

Multitudes have tasted the heavenly gifts who have never tasted the Gift of heaven. During the Apostolic age, miraculous gifts were given to men. Some could heal diseases, speak in tongues, and prophesy. But miraculous gifts, which appear to be gifts of the Spirit, are by no means an evidence of grace, salvation, and eternal life. Gifts of the Spirit can be, and often are, counterfeited by Satan (2Th_2:7-10).

Tasting the heavenly gifts and powers of the world to come is not salvation. Salvation is eating the Bread of Life. Salvation is not in miraculous gifts, but in immutable grace. Salvation is not in feelings, emotions, and experiences, no matter how great and life changing they may be. Salvation is in Christ! A man can preach with power and eloquence, and yet not know Christ. – Judas did. A man can perform miracles, and not know God. – Pharaoh’s magicians did. A man can cast out demons, and yet be the messenger of Satan (Mat_7:21-23). A person can speak in tongues, and yet speak by the power of the devil. A man can preach, promote, and defend righteousness, and yet speak by him who transforms his ministers into angels of light and preachers of righteousness. Spiritual gifts and usefulness must not be looked upon as evidences of grace and salvation.

Partakers of the Holy Ghost

This passage even speaks of lost men and women who have been made partakers of the Holy Ghost. Many people look at that and say, “Without question, these were once saved people.” But that is not the case at all. We read of wicked King Saul that, “The Spirit of God came upon him, and he prophesied,” but the Spirit of God was not in him. Balaam spoke by the Spirit and prophesied of Christ’s coming, but never knew the Christ of whom he spoke. In fact, Balaam’s ass even spoke a word from God by the power of his Spirit; but neither Balaam, nor his ass, were born of God.  Caiaphas, the high priest, spoke by the Spirit of God, declaring the gospel as plainly as any man ever did. Yet, he was a lost man.

It is possible for men to say and do things which, considered by themselves, make it appear that they are partakers of the Holy Spirit, though they are not born of the Spirit. There were many in our Lord’s day, as there are today, who believed; but the Master did not commit himself to them, because he knew what was in them (Joh_2:23-24).

Tasted the Word of God

We are told in Heb_6:5 that these people have even tasted the good Word of God and the powers of the world to come. They love good preaching, and are moved by it. You find them at every Bible conference. Their emotions are stirred by the preaching of the Word; but it never reaches their hearts.

This is what the Holy Spirit teaches us in this passage: — It is quite possible for men and women to enjoy rare, unusual gifts and experiences, without experiencing God’s saving grace in Christ. Outward gifts and heartfelt emotions impress and deceive. We must have something more. We must have Christ (1Co_13:1-3).

Here below you will find  information gathered by others who have closely followed the false teachings of Todd Bentley. Take your time working through these links.

BEWARE OF THE DECEPTION AND LIES OF TODD BENTLEY AND HIS ANGELS OF LIGHT. THIS IS WINNING of SOULS FOR SATAN’S  REVIVAL !!! THIS IS NOT CHRISTIAN IN ANY WAY !!!!

Bently SA 2013 a

Email me if you want the link to this image from the website of Todd Bentley

Shocking video about Tod Bentley’s Violent mininstry !!! 

To the Reader: This page contains selected articles, information, and news releases on Todd Bentley and his associates within the Word-Faith movement and the New Apostolic Reformation. This page will be updated as new information is made available.

The Elijah List  4/22/08

Todd Bentley’s Angels 4/26/08 

Todd Bentley and Contemplative Meditation 4/26/08

Todd Bentley Taught Contemplative Prayer and Silence 4/29/08

Bentley’s Lakeland Revival Keeps Moving Spirits… 5/20/08

Todd Bentley or Jesus Christ? 5/20/08

Todd Bentley: “Will We Get Fooled Again?” (Part 1) May 2008

To be Forewarned is to be Forearmed (Part 2) May 2008

A Story of Earth and Heaven (Part 3) May 2008

When the Angel came: The Branham connection (Part 4) May 2008

The fire-Fresh Fire (Part 5) May 2008

The Fire as an ANOINTING (Part 6) June 2008

Angels We have Heard and Seen (Part 7) June 2008

Wendy Alec: Prophet of God?

To the Sheepfold or the Luau? 5/21/08

Todd Bentley: The New Simon Magus 5/23/08

Tracking Bentley back to Benny 5/9/08

Todd Bentley Kicks ‘Older Lady’ with his ‘Biker-Boot’ 5/28/08

Todd Bentley’s Highway to Heaven 6/8/08

Fools for Christ–or just fools? June 2008

Is the Anointing Tangible and Transferable? June 2008T

odd Bentley: Miraculous Healings? 6/18/08

Same old scam? Even some Pentecostals are skeptical of Todd Bentley’s tent revival 6/20/08

Is this the healing hand of God?’ 6/21/08 (This two-page article from Belfast, Ireland highlights a Todd Bentley associate, Bobby Sullivan, and his on-stage healing antics)

Todd Bentley’s Commissioning, ATM Machines, Etc. 6/25/08

Todd Bentley’s Knighting 6/26/08

Stairway To Heaven: Celebrity Revivals Fleeting 6/26/08

Todd Bentley: George Banov’s Blasphemous ProphecyCanadian evangelist’s ministry draws kudos and criticism 7/3/08

Revival Drawing Criticism 7/10/08

ABC News ’Nightline’ Report (Part 1) 7/9/08

ABC News ‘Nightline’ Report (Part 2) 7/10/08

First Person Account: Neither faith nor healing 7/11/08

Todd Bentley and the ’13th Resurrection’ 7/23/08

POINTS to PONDER 8/10/08

Faith healer abandons pulpit (The Vancouver Province reports that “Christian bloggers across Canada and the U.S. are questioning Bentley’s authenticity”) 8/14/08

Todd Bentley and the Hotel Fire in Seattle 8/15/08

And the Prophets Prophesied Falsely… (“Bentley had more supernatural experiences than all the apostles put together. Like immature children being tucked into bed modern day charismatics accepted his supernatural tales.”) 8/22/08

BENTLEY AND BIGFOOT (“When it comes right down to it – it doesn’t matter if it’s real, as long as it’s believable; because in the end, it’s really not about truth – it’s about experiencing euphoria – finding something, anything or anyone that can make us feel good or feel better fast.”) 8/22/08

WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF FALSE PROPHETS! 8/30/08

Stacey Campbell Issues Statement About Todd Bentley 8/31/08

Patricia King and Internet Censorship 9/15/08

BONNIE JONES and HER B-MOVIE ‘DREAM’  9/20/08

Todd Bentley: An Angel Named ‘Mary’ 10/24/08

Patricia King: Feathers or Fiddlesticks? 11/10/08

Letter to Pastor David Jones 11/28/08

Benny Hinn Speaks Out Against the Florida Revival 11/28/08 (Benny Hinn is not only a hyper-heretic, he is a hyper-hypocrite)

Benny Hinn: ”Methinks thou protest too loudly” 12/5/08

Wendy Alec and Her Fantasy Series 12/13/08

Charlie Robinson and his ‘Pillow Fight with Jesus’ 12/29/08

Patricia King’s Hermetics Examined 1/15/09

Feathers from Heaven? 1/19/09

Questions on ’Angel Feathers’ 1/19/09

Signs & Wonders 1/20/09

DIAMONDS FROM HEAVEN? 1/20/09

Todd Bentley and his Muscle-Bound Jesus 2/6/09 (There is a huge difference between Todd Bentley’s “Jesus” and the Jesus of the Bible)

Todd Bentley: Sultan of Slap 2/10/09

Todd Bentley Time Traveler? 2/11/09

Joshua Mills: A Whale of a Fish Story 3/23/09

Faith Setzer and her Bleeding ‘Jesus’ 3/25/09

Todd Bentley Claimed but Not Ordained 4/7/09

Todd Bentley The Art of the Non-Apologetic Apology 4/18/09

Todd Bentley: Preaching the Gospel ‘Won’t Win Souls’ 4/28/09

Todd Bentley Heal or heel? 5/8/09

Comments on Todd Bentley and the article, “Heal or Heel” 5/9/09

Two People “Healed”at the Lakeland Revival Die 5/10/09

Some Dare Call It ‘Christian’ 5/5/09

Six Simple Questions for Todd Bentley 10/22/09

Todd Bentley’s Tweets on Twitter not Twitterrific 11/18/09

Bob Jones Says Christians Have Put A Curse on Todd Bentley 1/12/10

Todd Bentley Crowing for Dollars 4/14/10

Articles on the Brownsville and Toronto Revivals

The Green River of Brownsville: Lifestyles of the Rich and Not-So Famous 1998

The Raging River of Brownsville: PFO Responds to Michael L. Brown’s Attack of the Critics of the Pensacola Revival 1998

Newspaper Challenges Revival’s Claims 1998

Confronting the Superstitious Church of the 21st Century 1998

Christian Fortune-Tellers Never Get It Right, Either 1999

The Wandering River of Brownsville 1999

Rod Parsley: The Raging Prophet 1999

All That Glitters…Gold Fillings and Truth Decay Toronto 1999

The Remarkable Exploits of David Hogan: Astonishing Miracles or Incredible Hype? 2000

Can You Be Deceived? Why People Are Duped and How Not To Be 2000

Supernatural Messages From The Mundane? (James Ryle, Bob Jones, Rick Joyner) 2001

And the Prophets Prophesied Falsely… (“Bentley had more supernatural experiences than all the apostles put together. Like immature children being tucked into bed modern day charismatics accepted his supernatural tales.”) 8/22/08

BENTLEY AND BIGFOOT (“When it comes right down to it – it doesn’t matter if it’s real, as long as it’s believable; because in the end, it’s really not about truth – it’s about experiencing euphoria – finding something, anything or anyone that can make us feel good or feel better fast.”) 8/22/08

CRS Statement: Todd Bentley’s ‘Special Commissioning Service’<<

HL - http://www.christianresearchservice.com/ToddBentleyResearchPage.htm

1 John 4:1-6 KJV Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. (2) Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: (3) And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. (4) Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world. (5) They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them. (6) We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

A special test for false preachers

1Jn_4:1-6

In this chapter, the apostle warns against evil seducing spirits, advises us to examine and try the spirits, gives rules by which evil spirits are recognized and then returns to his favorite subject — brotherly love!

v.1. ‘Beloved, believe not every spirit.’ The word ‘spirit’ signifies to a man who claims to be endowed with the gift of the Spirit to perform the office of prophet, preacher, or teacher. God’s word is received from the mouth of man, but some who claim to speak for God are false preachers and are sent by Satan to deceive and disturb the church. There were false teachers among Israel, there were false teachers in the days of the apostles and there are false teachers today (2Pe_2:1-3; 2Co_11:13-15). Let this fact be fixed in our minds that, from the time the gospel began to be preached, false prophets immediately appeared, and we must not be dazzled by everybody who claims to be holy, to speak for God, to work wonders and to be a minister of righteousness. We must try these spirits (these preachers and religious leaders).

v.2. Let all preachers and religious leaders be tried by the word of God first (Act_17:11; Isa_8:19-20). This will expose most of them, for they do not preach the word of truth at all. Their messages are full of free will, human righteousness, life by law and works, the advocacy of Mary and saints, God’s weakness and inability, sabbath keeping, rituals and holy days, infant salvation and all manner of tradition and open error. But John lays down a special mark by which we can easily distinguish between true and false prophets. Christ Jesus is the object of true faith and the whole foundation of acceptance with God. Therefore, he is also the stone at which all heretics stumble, and his person and work will be the place where error will be most evident. (Mahan, Henry – Commentary on John and Romans through Jude (22 books)

call911

In case any of Tod Bentley’ or any of his body guards decides to kick you in the gut !! Please call the EMERGENCY SERVICES !!!



BEWARE !! NEW NAR “BIBLE” A DANGEROUS HERESY

$
0
0

042213-passiontranslation

by Amy Spreeman

Have you heard about the latest Bible “translation?” This one comes from the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) camp, from the brain of one man, a human-appointed “Apostle.” It’s called “The Passion Translation,” written by Brian Simmons of Stairway Ministries.

Simmons has actually released four installments of his new translation:

Coming this fall he is releasing Proverbs, Wisdom From Above.

Let’s do a side-by-side comparison of Proverbs 8. Just for fun, I’ll use the NIV to compare what the Bible says, vs. what Simmons thinks it should say. First, the real deal:

Screen-shot-2013-05-26-at-8.29.29-AM

Now here’s Simmons’ Passion version of Proverbs 8, in which he claims lots of secret are being unveiled:

Screen-shot-2013-05-26-at-8.31.56-AM

More spiritual manipulation

Simmons says our standard translations of the Bible, transcribed by hundreds of scholars from the original scrolls, are just head knowledge and don’t adequately capture God’s passion. (He apparently missed the part in 2 Timothy 3:16 that says that every word is breathed-out by the Holy Spirit.) From his website:

The Passion Translation Project is a groundbreaking attempt to re-introduce the passion and fire of the Bible to the English reader. God longs to have His Word expressed in every language in a way that would unlock the ‘passion’ of His heart. The goal of this work is to trigger inside of every English speaker an overwhelming response to the truth of the Bible as it is unfiltered by religious jargon – unfolding the deep mysteries of the Scriptures in the language of love, the language of the heart. Accurate to the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts, but passionately powerful in a contemporary form.

Holly Pivec over at Spirit of Error blog points out that Simmons is manipulating Scriptures to make it appear that heretical NAR teachings and practices such as “prophetic singing,” the “transference of an anointing,” and the issuing of “apostolic decrees,” are actually supported by the Bible – which of course is false. But to the biblically illiterate, it will sound so right:

This translation is potentially one of the most disturbing developments in the NARmovement. Simmons is following in the footsteps of the major cults of Christianity who have released their own translations of the Bible, including the New World Translationused by the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Joseph Smith Translation used by some groups of Mormons.

By creating a new NAR translation of the Bible, Simmons is shaping the way a generation of NAR followers will read and understand Scripture–and also creating a divide between those who use the NAR translation and those who don’t.

It remains to be seen how many NAR people will make the switch to this NARtranslation of the Bible. If a lot of them do switch Bibles, then The Passion Translation could truly–as its advertisements say–”impact the Church for years to come.” Source:

Hat Tip: Bart McCurdy

Related articles on this blog:

Warning! Rick Joyner to visit South Africa and Join hands with Angus Buchan

Angus Buchan: Evangelist or Revivalist?

New Apostolic Nuttiness.

Soaking Prayer? The New NAR Pagan Approach, Beware !

WARNING ! WARNING !! Todd Bentley is coming to serve Satan in South Africa

Also Related over at Stand Up For The Truth  :

Men who are changing the Word of God better take heed to these words from Scripture : 

For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
(Revelation 22:18-19 KJV)


Warning ! False Teacher Todd Bentley is Back in South Africa !!

$
0
0

Todd back in SA

Thank you to my dear sister Amy Spreeman from Stand Up for the Truth informing us of this.  Also read here WARNING ! WARNING !! Todd Bentley is coming to serve Satan in South Africa

todd-bentley

By Amy Spreeman 

TODD BENTLEY’S FALSE TEACHINGS COMING BACK TO S. AFRICA

The Signs and Wonders and the Word Faith prosperity heresy is sweeping through third-world nations, especially in Africa where many Christians need your prayers right now to stand strong against this heresy.

Todd Bentley is not the only false teacher preying on the lambs, but is certainly the most popular. And organizations like FreshFire (Which Todd founded) and GodTV, have no problem promoting him to ensure the highest audience numbers (and naturally, tithers and contributors).

Remember, this is the charlatan who was banned from Great Britain last year for his dangerous and philanderous teachings. Here is the most blasphemous teaching from a wolf you will ever hear, from Todd Bentley’s most recent visit to South Africa at the end of April:

Here is the excerpt from GodTV’s website:

This Healing Awakening is taking a short break this week while we re-locate the services to Cape Town. We will be back on air with Evangelist Todd Bentley and the GOD TV team next week.

Join us as revival spreads to Cape Town… Evening meetings will be held at the Lofdal World Prayer Centre, Bella Vista Road (off Old Paarl Road), Kraaifontein, Cape Town from Wednesday 5th June, starting at 7pm.

God wants to release an impartation of His anointing on your Life,” says Todd Bentley, who is the founder of Fresh Fire USA. This is in keeping with Romans 1:11“For I long to see you, that I may impart to you some spiritual gift, so that you may be established.”

Lord, may these precious sheep have spiritual eyes of discernment from your Holy Spirit that they would recognize false teachings, and be bold enough to call out, mark and avoid these wolves.

Related articles

false-prophets-ravenous-wolves (1)

call911

In case of Tod Bentley’ or any of his body guards decides to kick you in the gut !! Please call the EMERGENCY SERVICES !!!


Why Is the Charismatic Movement Thriving in Africa?

$
0
0

Pagan Ancestral spirits

Also read these article placed on our blog :  Warning! Rick Joyner to visit South Africa and Join hands with Angus Buchan. Also see here Angus Buchan: Evangelist or Revivalist?Oom (Uncle) Angus Buchan from the Mighty Men Revivals and of Faith like Potatoes fame and The Apostolic Prophetic Conference of Neville Norden’s church Lewende Woord. We  also previously reported on Gretha Wiid from the Worthy Women Revivals,  Buchan’s South African female understudy. And also WARNING ! WARNING !! Todd Bentley is coming to serve Satan in South Africa .

By Conrad Mbewe

Conrad Mbewe is the pastor of Kabwata Baptist Church in Zambia, Africa. He is one of the keynote speakers at the Strange Fire conference in October offered by Grace to You the church of John MacArthur. 

Many explanations have been given for the explosion of the Charismatic movement in Africa. Many have seen this as a powerful visitation of the Holy Spirit. Whereas there is probably more than one reason, I want to add my own observation to this for what it is worth. In this blog post, I do not refer to the old conservative form of Pentecostalism once represented by the Assemblies of God churches. I have in mind the current extreme form that is mushrooming literally under every shrub and tree in Africa. How can one explain this phenomenon?

I think that one reason why the Charismatic movement in Africa has been like a wild bushfire is because it has not challenged the African religious worldview but has instead adopted it. It has simply baptised it with Bible verses and Christian words that previously meant something totally different.
The African Spiritual Worldview
Let me explain what I mean. The African spiritual worldview consists of four tiers.
  1. God
  2. Angels and demons
  3. Ancestral spirits
  4. Human beings
It is because of this reality that Africans do not question the existence of God, as is the case with many people in the Western world. To an African, God is there. He is the Creator and ultimate Governor and Benefactor of the whole universe.

NGS Picture ID:585092

Rather, in our spiritual worldview, although God is there he is very far away. Between him and us as human beings lie two layers in the spirit world. One is that of angels and demons (i.e. bad angels) and the other—which is even closer to us—is that of the spirits of the departed.
So, although God is a benevolent, loving, and caring Being, unless the beings that dwell in these two layers that lie between him and us are appeased, his blessings cannot reach us. It is, therefore, important to appease the ancestral spirits and defeat the demons. Only after that will God’s blessings come upon us.
This is where in African traditional religions witchdoctors come in. They are the people with the mysterious power to break through these two layers. They tell us what we must do in order to appease the spirits of our forefathers. They also engage the demons for us through their midnight trances, dances, and incense.
So, a person who is beset with perennial illnesses, failing to get a job, failing to find a spouse or to have children, whose business is failing to thrive, etc., simply goes to the witchdoctor who alone has the key to look into the spirit world. He is told that it is either a deceased person or an evil spirit who is frustrating him.
Sometimes the enemy is a person who is alive. However, the reason why this living individual seems to have a mysterious hold over your life is because he has plugged into those two layers (of either dead ancestors or evil spirits) and you have not. With the help of a powerful witchdoctor you can outsmart him in those two layers, and the blessings of God can once again begin to flow into your life.
Whichever way, the power of the witchdoctor is not in explaining truth but in mindless frenzy. His grip upon the popular mind is his eerie mysteriousness and his capacity to knock you out of your senses and then pronounce you delivered. Of course, this is never done by benevolence. You pay for his services.
The Charismatic Movement’s Rendition
I do not mean to be unkind, but what the modern Charismatic movement in Africa has done is to simply take this entire erroneous superstructure of African religious worldview and baptise it with wrongly applied Bible verses and Christian language. The only difference is that the layer of dead ancestors and evil spirits is now one hotchpotch of confusion. This is why the nonsense of demons becoming spirit husbands and wives, and wrecking havoc in marriages, is taken for granted! This is also why the heresy of generation curses has become so popular. In our minds, bad luck can be passed on from that layer of dead ancestors.
In the African Charismatic circles, the “man of God” has replaced the witchdoctor. He is the one who oozes with mysterious power that enables him to break through those two impregnable layers, which us lesser mortals cannot penetrate. So, when blessings are not flowing our way despite our prayers, we make a beeline to his quarters or his church for help. This explains the throngs in these circles. The crowds are not looking for someone to explain to them the way to find pardon with God. No! They want the “man of God” to pray for them.
This also explains the stranglehold that “men of God” have on the minds of their devotees in these circles. In the Evangelicalism of a former generation “men of God” were primarily preachers of the word of God, but in the new setup they are primarily priests who enter the inner sanctuaries to bring down blessings to us.
This also explains why the answer to almost any problem that you take to these “men of God” is “deliverance” and “breakthrough”. God wants to bless you, but you need to break through these impregnable layers before those blessings can reach you. The prayers of the “man of God” will bring deliverance because at the overnight prayer meeting or on the hill he will bring about a breakthrough. Who can doubt that these two phrases have become the key words of this movement?This also explains why prayer in the modern Charismatic movement in Africa is literally a fight. In fact, the people praying are called “prayer warriors”. Although they begin by addressing God, within the first few seconds they divert from God and begin to fight the spirits in these impregnable layers with their bare knuckles. The language is almost always, “We bind every unclean spirit in Jesus’ name! We loose the Spirit that breaks the yoke in Jesus’ name!”The “prayer warriors” scream at the top of their voices and chant the name of Jesus. They sweat as they put up a gallant fight with these spirits, straining every muscle of their beings until they prevail (so they think). That is when they reach through to God and his blessings begin to flow. This is nothing more than the African traditional religious worldview sprinkled with a thin layer of Christianity.
Notice also how teaching is not the strength of the modern Charismatic movement in Africa. Its chief proponents survive on a few, well-worn, tortured verses: “By his stripes we are healed,” “We are not the tail but the head,” etc. There is absolutely no effort to properly exegete Scripture. Rather, by chanting phrases and making people drop under some trance, in witchdoctor fashion, they are holding sway over the popular mind. The people love it and are paying for it! The “men of God” are becoming stinking rich as the crowds just keep on coming.
This Is Not Christianity
What worries me is that this is so obvious that I am wondering why we are not seeing this. Or if we are, why we are not warning Christians against this. For the love of crowds, we have allowed African traditional religion to enter the church through the back door. Like the Arabian camel, it has since kicked out the truth. This is why I am not excited by the multiplication of churches—or ministries—under this banner.
We need to sound the warning that this is not Christianity. I know that this approach is filling our church buildings and classrooms to overflowing, until we have to multiply church services in order to accommodate the crowds. But this is not Christianity. It does not lead to heaven. It is a thin coating over the religion that has been on African soil for time immemorial, which Christianity was meant to replace. We have lost the Christian faith while we are holding the Bible in our hands and using some of its words. This is really sad.
The religion of the Bible does not teach a God who is so far away from us that unless some powerful humans come in and give us a breakthrough he cannot bless us. No! The Bible teaches a God who is near us. The only barrier between God and us is our sin, and Jesus has dealt with that by his death on the cross.
When we pray, we are in the throne room of divine grace talking directly to God. We do not need to address demons and ancestral spirits before we break through to him. We do not need to chant and jump around like witchdoctors around their fire under the midnight moonlight. God is our heavenly Father. Only our sin can hinder our prayers.Listen! Angels and demons exist, but they are not an impregnable spiritual strata that needs someone reeking with anointing to breakthrough their layer before we can access God’s blessing. They are simply beings that either carry out God’s commands or the devil’s commands. They are not between God and us!
Finally, we do not need “men of God” to lay hands on us every Sunday (or at Friday overnight prayer meetings, or on hills in the outskirts of our cities) in order for us to know God’s blessings. There is only one Mediator between God and us—it is the man, Christ Jesus. All others are imposters and must be rejected with the contempt they deserve.

Former Archbishop Desmond Tutu prefers Hell to the God of the Bible

$
0
0

Tutu UN

Tutu said more than”I MUCH RATHER PREFER TO GO TO HELL THAN A ‘HOMOPHOBIC HEAVEN”

He also said what is more concerning :  “Not all in the Bible is true” 

The following exerpt was translated by Grant Swart.  The original report by Neels Jackson appeared in our local Afrikaans News Paper, Beeld.

Not all in the Bible is true ? 

Cape Town  – Simply because something is written in the Bible, does not mean that it is necessarily true.

Yesterday, this was how Archbishop Desmond Tutu referred to sections of the Bible written by the Apostle Paul, which address homosexuality.

He was speaking at the launch of the United Nations campaign toward equality for gay, lesbian, bi-sexual and transgender human rights (GLBT), where he also stated that he felt just as strongly about these rights as he did about apartheid, and that he fully supported the campaign.

He appealed to religious leaders to become involved and said that it concerned human rights.

He said that people often quote the Apostle Paul and, however, that Paul had said many things, such as that women should remain quiet and that everyone should get married. “Just because something is written in the Bible, it is not necessarily true.” He further stated that Bible texts were a great source of torment for many people. He said that he could feel their terrible torment.

Twice he made referral to the same point, “I would refuse to go to a homophobic heaven. No, I would say sorry, I mean I would much rather go to the other place.” Later, “I would not worship a God who is homophobic and that is how deeply I feel about this,” he said, condemning the use of religious justification for anti-gay prejudice.

It is the first time that the UN has started a campaign such as this. The campaign is known as “Free and Equal”.

Also at the campaign with Tutu were Judge Edwin Cameron and the UN high commissioner for human rights, Navi Pillay.

 Below Screen shot taken from Beeld an Afrikaans newspaper in South Africa written by Neels Jackson:

Tutu

Read full Afrikaans article Link Here : http://www.beeld.com/nuus/2013-07-27-nie-alles-in-die-bybel-is-waar-tutu

FORMER ‘ARCHBISHOP’ DESMOND TUTU: I MUCH RATHER PREFER TO GO TO HELL THAN A ‘HOMOPHOBIC HEAVEN’

Stand Up For The Truth, Thank you Amy Spreeman , placed with permission…

729px-DesmondTutuDec10

CAPE TOWN – During a news conference introducing a United Nations homosexual rights campaign, former African Angelican archbishop and anti-apartheid activist Desmond Tutu told reporters that he would rather go to Hell than a “homophobic Heaven.”

“I would refuse to go to a homophobic Heaven. No, I would say, ‘Sorry, I would much rather go to the other place,’” Tutu, 81, stated. “I would not worship a God who is homophobic and that is how deeply I feel about this.”

He made the comments Friday at a news conference for the UN’s “Free and Equal” campaign in Cape Town, South Africa, which was spearheaded by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. The campaign seeks to gain equality for homosexuals worldwide, including in Africa, where most nations oppose or criminalize sexual activity between those of the same gender.

“I am as passionate about this campaign as I ever was about apartheid,” Tutu said. “For me, it is at the same level.”

FULL STORY HERE

Original article appeared Here : Former ‘Archbishop’ Desmond Tutu: I Much Rather Prefer to Go to Hell Than a ‘Homophobic Heaven’

Further more see below on what else Desmond Tutu had to say around 2006.

Tutu says God is not a Christian

Tutu : “God is not a Christian”

By Parker T. Williamson / Posted on 3/8/2006

The Rev. Desmond Tutu, archbishop and primate of Southern Africa, has weighed in with World Council of Churches leaders who seek to have the council transcend Christian boundaries. “After all,” said Tutu, “God is not a Christian.”

According to Tutu, this act of Jesus Christ set in motion a unity that knows no boundaries. In fact, although Christ is the one who initiates this unity, allegiance to Christ is apparently not a necessary prerequisite for entering into this unity. “Jesus, it appears, was quite serious when he said that God was our father and that we belonged all to one family, because in this family all, not some, are insiders. None is an outsider – black and white, yellow and red, rich and poor, educated and not educated, beautiful and not so beautiful, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, atheist, all belong, all are held in a divine embrace that will not let us go – all, for God has no enemies.”

The key toward re-establishing that primordial unity that God intends for all his creation is the unity of the church, Tutu said. Suggesting that the unity of the human family is dependent on the unity of the church, and the unity of the church is, in large degree, dependent on the unity of the World Council of Churches, Tutu said, “A united church is no optional extra. A united church is indispensable for the salvation of God’s world.”

In a press conference that followed his address, Tutu emphasized his key point: “We believe in one family, and in our quest for this one family, the WCC is crucial.” Tutu congratulated the WCC for being “one of the foremost forums for interfaith dialogues, an activity that must be taken even more seriously today.”

A reporter asked Tutu if there are any limits to plurality and diversity when seeking unity. “God is the God of all,” replied Tutu. “We are too prone to excommunicate. God welcomes all of us . Today we Christians have moved a long way toward understanding that we don’t have a corner on the God market.

Inter-religious dialogue is high on the priority list for this 9th General Assembly of the WCC. During his opening remarks, Aram I, moderator of the WCC, urged delegates to think beyond the walls of the church and consider the possibility of “the hidden Christ” in other religious traditions. The moderator’s suggestion was seconded by Rowan Williams, archbishop of Canterbury, who urged the WCC to find new models through which Christians could see in the eyes of non-Christians “a reflection of what we see,” even if they do not identify that vision in Christian terms.

Throughout the assembly meeting, non-Christian spiritualists and those who practice “indigenous peoples” traditions have been provided seminar space and “ecumenical conversation” opportunities, in order for delegates to learn how they communicate with the spirit world and to engage them in inter-faith dialogues.

HL : http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1592144/posts


Prominent Christian Leader Rebukes Desmond Tutu For His Unbelief

$
0
0
download

ACDP leader Rev Kenneth Meshoe

Meshoe slams Tutu over ‘homophobic God’

2013-07-31 08:41

Cape Town – ACDP leader Rev Kenneth Meshoe has slammed Archbishop EmeritusDesmond Tutu for his “homophobic God” statement, The Cape Times reported on Wednesday.

“Archbishop Desmond Tutu is out of order when he alleged that God is a homophobic God, and that he finds fault with scriptures that teach that homosexual life style is a sin before God,” the African Christian Democratic Party leader was quoted as saying.

“We ask Archbishop Tutu not to confuse people who respect the scriptures, and advised him to keep his unbelief to himself if he does not believe in the teaching of the Holy Bible.”

He was reacting to Tutu’s comments on Friday, at the launch of a United Nations campaign to promote the fair treatment of lesbians and gays.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE !!

And also read what Desmond Tutu said here :

Former Archbishop Desmond Tutu prefers Hell to the God of the Bible


Biblical Principles For Christian Women in the Digital World

$
0
0

48004_151659458340087_323532656_n

Young Women and Discretion

by Walter E. Isenhour

“The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness . . .  that they may teach the young women to be sober . . . to be discreet, chaste . . .  that the word of God be not blasphemed” —Titus 2:3-5.

In the fifth verse of the second chapter of Titus the aged women are to teach young women “to be discreet.” What does it mean to be discreet? It means to be prudent, judicious, cautious; wise in conduct and management, especially as to matters of propriety and self-control.

A young woman who measures up to these qualities in mind, heart, soul, spirit, and life certainly rises above the degrading principles of sin and wickedness. Her life is one of nobility, beauty, usefulness, and sublimity. She sets examples before her husband, children, and neighbors that areworthy of emulation. They know her life is hid with Christ in God. She possesses the Spirit of our Lord, and this enables her to discern between the evil and the good, and to avoid evil, error, and anything and all things that would mislead her. She likewise shields her husband and children from evils and errors, sins and wickedness, that they are environed with. At least she warns and cautions them against such, and shows them the higher, better, holier, and more beautiful and worthwhile things in life.

The discreet woman is possessed with the spirit and ability to adopt “means to an end,” and of course this means that which brings her and the family to a good end. She avoids the means that would injure her life, character, soul, and influence, and that would likewise injure her family and those about her. She must realize that what she takes into her life will have its effect, through the years—and will bring her to a good end, only as the means are good. She knows that the good will work out right, while the bad will work out wrong. She realizes that the good is a means to a good end, but the bad is a means to a bad end. Therefore she takes into her very soul the good and rejects the bad. She is discreet. Those who know her realize that she is a woman of great and commendable discretion.

Her discretion includes prudence. She is careful about her conduct, her influence, her aims, plans,  and purposes. She guards her tongue, her temper, and her dress. She is decent in dress, upright in manners, and is careful to lead others right. She uses economy at home, seeing that nothing is wasted, and lives within her income. Extravagance is far from her. She is not stingy by any means, as there is a vast difference in stinginess and economy. Rather, she is blessedly liberal, yet she is cautious to see that money is not foolishly and uselessly expended; that food and clothing are not wasted, and that anything usable is not cast into the rubbish heap and carried away as rubbish.

The discreet woman is likewise judicious. She is governed by sound judgment. She is wise. The devil can’t lead her into the snares, traps, and pitfalls that he leads the sinful, wicked world into. She prays for wisdom, for sound judgment, and God gives it unto her. She helps her husband with his problems, and helps him in his decisions, plans, aims, and purposes. She uses her good judgment in the home, in the church, in the community; and when she passes on anything, it is usually right. The enemy can’t “pull the wool over her eyes” as he does the woman who only lives in sin and serves the world and the flesh. To God be the praise and the glory. What a blessed thing for a wife and mother to be sound in her judgment—and when she passes on anything, for it to be in reason and within the will of God! If sometimes she errs, it is an exception, and is of the head and not the heart. God overrules in all such and brings good out of it (Rom. 8:28).

The discreet woman is cautious as to how she lives, with whom she keeps company, where she goes, what she says, and what she does along life’s journey. She helps her husband and children to be cautious. We might say, too, that the unmarried woman is discreet—and every one should be—who uses much caution as she journeys through the years. She is cautious as to her company, as to her courtship and companionship, as to her character and virtue, her conduct, and influence. She is cautious about everything that pertains to noble and beautiful womanhood. She regards her character far above riches, and the trifling evils, pleasures, amusements, and destructive sins of the world. To her, clean, pure, upright womanhood is a “pearl of great price” (Matt. 13:46). She would not sell her virtue, character, and pure womanhood for all the gold and silver, rubies, diamonds, jewels, and pearls in the world. She is not for sale at any price. That’s womanhood at its best. That is what makes a woman a real lady in the sight of both God and man. Men respect her, admire, love, and appreciate her, out of hearts that are godly, which likewise make them Christian gentlemen.

The discreet woman conducts herself wisely. Life to her is real and earnest. It is noble and sublime. Her deportment is such that men take knowledge of her—that she has “been with Jesus” (Acts 4:13). She possesses great self-control. She cannot be led astray, like silly women who are worldly and ungodly. She anchors her life to God, to Christ, the mighty “Rock of Ages.”

To be a discreet woman is a wonderful height to reach in life. It is more to be desired than education, fame, honor, and earthly glory. The woman of great discretion certainly out-rises, outshines, and far outdistances the ungodly movie star, actress, popular worldly flapper, or anyone else that lives for the devil.

Dedicated to all my Facebook lady friends and Sisters,

Elmarie

Some things we can glean from about women usurping authority over men to the discerning godly woman , this will make sense :

Usurping Women , and modern day Divas, have been the originators of many false Charismatic movements !

Miriam usurped her place by claiming to be equal with Moses!

Notice that Miriam usurped her place by claiming to be equal with Moses! Yes Aaron was also involved, but he was following the lead of Miriam who was made a leper. Aaron was not made a leper, proving she was the instigator! (Aaron was easily swayed by the people when the people made the golden calf, “the people made me do it”)

Numbers 12:1 Then Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Cushite woman whom he had married (for he had married a Cushite woman); 2 and they said, “Has the Lord indeed spoken only through Moses? Has He not spoken through us as well?” And the Lord heard it. 3 (Now the man Moses was very humble, more than any man who was on the face of the earth.) 4 And suddenly the Lord said to Moses and Aaron and to Miriam, “You three come out to the tent of meeting.” So the three of them came out. 5 Then the Lord came down in a pillar of cloud and stood at the doorway of the tent, and He called Aaron and Miriam. When they had both come forward, 6 He said, “Hear now My words: If there is a prophet among you, I, the Lord, shall make Myself known to him in a vision. I shall speak with him in a dream.

7 “Not so, with My servant Moses, He is faithful in all My household; 8 With him I speak mouth to mouth, Even openly, and not in dark sayings, And he beholds the form of the Lord. Why then were you not afraid To speak against My servant, against Moses?”

9 So the anger of the Lord burned against them and He departed. 10 But when the cloud had withdrawn from over the tent, behold, Miriam was leprous, as white as snow. As Aaron turned toward Miriam, behold, she was leprous. 11 Then Aaron said to Moses, “Oh, my lord, I beg you, do not account this sin to us, in which we have acted foolishly and in which we have sinned. 12 “Oh, do not let her be like one dead, whose flesh is half eaten away when he comes from his mother’s womb!” 13 And Moses cried out to the Lord, saying, “O God, heal her, I pray!” 14 But the Lord said to Moses, “If her father had but spit in her face, would she not bear her shame for seven days? Let her be shut up for seven days outside the camp, and afterward she may be received again.” 15 So Miriam was shut up outside the camp for seven days, and the people did not move on until Miriam was received again.

Hippolytus wrote of the Montanists, “They have been deceived by two females, Priscilla and Maximilla by name, whom they hold to be prophetesses, asserting that into them the Paraclete spirit entered…. They magnify these females above the Apostles and every gift of Grace, so that some of them go so far as to say that in them there is something more than Christ….

Another group that practiced a form of tongues was the Shakers, an American sect with Quaker roots that flourished in the mid-1700s. Mother Ann Lee, founder of the sect, regarded herself as the female equivalent of Jesus Christ.

Ellen White founded the Seventh-day Adventist church and members must vow to believe that she was a prophet! From the 27 Fundamental beliefs, #17 “The gift of Prophecy: One of the gifts of the Holy Spirit is prophecy. This gift is an identifying mark of the remnant church and was manifested in the ministry of Ellen G. White.

Mary Baker Eddy, The First Church of Christ, Scientist, and Miscellany (Boston: First Church of Christ, Scientist, 1941), 115.) Although the errors of Christian Science regarding God, Christ, and the Scriptures are well documented in numerous books, Mrs. Eddy was convinced she was used by God to reveal his truth for her day. (Charismatic Chaos, John F. MacArthur, 1991, p. 80)

Mrs. Cardale and her sister Emily ~ 1831 ~ She was a member of Edward Irving’s congregation in England and on April 30, 1831 she began to speak in other tongues and prophesy. Irving was impressed and did not exercise any restraint towards this member’s activity. Soon Mrs. Cardale’s sister Emily also began to speak in tongues and prophesy, and others followed them.

Agnes Ozman beginning of modern Pentecostalism ~ 1901 ~ The modern Pentecostal movement began on January 1, 1901, in Bethel Bible College in Topeka, Kansas, operated by Charles Parham, a minister with a background in the Holiness movement. The students began to seek the baptism of the Spirit with tongues, and Agnes Ozman was the first student to experience speaking in tongues. She claimed she spoke in several languages immediately. She is the first woman in North America to speak in tongues!

Woodworth-Etter, Maria ~ (1844-1924) ~ She was one of the more mystical of all the neo-Montanist women. She was a traveling evangelist, one of the first women to take this role in America and was initially part of the holiness-healing movement. In the 1880′s she was known to go into trances and stand stock-still for hours and sometimes days. During these trance times people would come into her meetings and be miraculously healed or converted. In 1890 she reports people receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit as evidenced with the speaking in other tongues and people seeing heavenly visions. “The Holy Ghost was present in great power, with gifts, signs, and visions, following the laying-on-of-hands. There were visible signs of light and glory on the pulpit, and through the congregation seen by the natural eye by some” (Signs & Wonders, Harrison House, pg. 150-151)

Foursquare Gospel Church [Aimee Semple McPherson] ~ 1920′s – 1930′s ~ Nationally known healing evangelist in the 1920′s – 1930′s. Founded and headed the Foursquare Gospel Church, led a controversial life and died of a drug overdose in 1944.

Kathryn Kuhlman ~ Kathryn Kuhlman was ordained a Baptist minister, but did not associate her ministry with any denomination She was heavily influenced by the Azusa street revival, and by the Roman Catholic church. She was well known for the manifestations that occurred at her meetings, including “laughter”. She is said to be responsible for the introduction of the manifestation of “Slain in the Spirit”. There were some differences to the current movement, though, in that she insisted that her meetings be orderly. Manifestations interrupting the service were not permitted. She was highly regarded in many Christian circles, and strongly influenced Benny Hinn and John Arnott.

Pensacola/Brownsville blessing ~ 1995-2000 ~ The testimonies of the two young girls at Pensacola mark a major shift in that revival.

Read more here : Usurping Women have been the originators of many false Charismatic movements !

Titus 2:3-5 KJV The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things; (4) That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, (5) To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.

1 Corinthians 14:33-35 KJV (33) For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. (34) Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. (35) And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

1 Timothy 2:9-12 KJV In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; (10) But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. (11) Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. (12) But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.


“We Eat Grass To Be Closer To God”, Says A High Profile False Preacher From South Africa

$
0
0
dl1


Pastor Lesego Daniel, who is based in Garankuwa, north of Pretoria, told dozens of followers to eat grass because “it will bring them closer to God”.

SA “pastor” under fire over grass-eating followers

2014-01-13 09:46

Pretoria – A South African church leader has come under fire after reports that he made members of his congregation eat grass.

Pastor Lesego Daniel, who is based in Garankuwa, north of Pretoria, told dozens of followers to eat grass because “it will bring them closer to God”.

Daniel made headlines globally after images were shown of his followers laying down in a field and furiously munching grass. Further images were then shown of some followers vomiting.

Eating grass

The news has been carried by UK media and many South African organisations.

People were apparently been drawn to the pastor’s church, Rabboni Centre Ministries, after it was claimed that he performed miracles.

One of Daniel’s followers, Doreen Kgatle, says she had a stroke two years ago and could not walk but since eating the grass she regained the strength in her legs.

But many people have started questioning Daniel’s credentials and complained on the ministry’s Facebook page.

woman-eats-grass-rabboni-centre-ministries-south-africa

(PHOTO: FACEBOOK/RABBONI CENTRE MINISTRIES)

A woman eats grass at the Rabboni Centre Ministries Church in South Africa.

rabboni-centre-ministries-lesego-daniel

(PHOTO: FACEBOOK/RABBONI CENTRE MINISTRIES)

Pastor Lesego Daniel (with mic) of South Africa’s Rabboni Centre Ministries walks on congregants he commanded to go to sleep.

“No man of God would tell the people of his flock to eat grass… this man is not of God, run away as far as you can from him and his teachings,” said one user.

“Did you yourself taste that grass? Why feed it to your congregation? This is purely abuse of power and betraying God’s word!” says another.

Daniel has not responded to the complaints or queries but some of his followers have come to his defence.

“I don’t care wat peaple say even my family members come nd intimidate me but i stand firm in the word of God nd tell them this is my pastor sent to me nd the nations by God to God be the Glory [sic],” said one church member.

rabboni-centre-ministries-lesego-daniel (1)

(PHOTO: FACEBOOK/RABBONI CENTRE MINISTRIES)

Congregants of the Rabboni Centre Ministries in South Africa react to eating ‘healing’ grass.

1005986_621245794560794_1585128256_n

(PHOTO: FACEBOOK/RABBONI CENTRE MINISTRIES)

Above Photo with this written “This will give you wings of a giant eagle, so you will be taken out brought to God Himself. When that happens, you are with God inheriting the earth. Seeing what is happening with your life, shall be a testament, as you came not ordinary but with eagles wings.”

1486785_708930959125610_1306185127_n

(PHOTO: FACEBOOK/RABBONI CENTRE MINISTRIES) Daniel bending down and touching the People attending his Synagogue of Satan

Here is an extract from the Rabboni Centre Ministries from a sermon by Daniel, and note,  the discerning believer will clearly pick up on how Scripture is twisted and contorted to tickle the ears of the hearers .

Rabboni Centre Ministries Facebook Page

Rabboni Centre Ministries

4 January

Tonight’s Word
(Let this month of fasting be the development of our Spirit where we are even prepared for the year. Fast in Spirit and in truth not with your mind)

If you keep the law, you don’t experience Christ and fullness of Him
Colossians 2:6-15 (beware here meaning, they came and preached a different gospel. You start well then along the way, tradition of man *bad company corrupts* and now you don’t experience Christ. It is difficult to change a man doctrinated by a man. There’s law that comes from man and becomes his tradition. Do not be slaves of men.
We need the fullness of God as Christians, as we might find ourselves not having the fullness of Him and principalities dealing with you. You might find yourself doing Isaiah 28 – plough, level and at the end having no seed. This means you fast but receiving nothing, no results.)
Reference Scriptures:
John 1:16 so, out of His fullness we receive, imagine if you make it a lifestyle, you will always receive. John 10 –“I’ve come that you may have life in abundance” so out of that abundance, you receive. Ephesians 3 – He is able to do exceedingly above all that we ask or think abundantly according to the power that works in us.” Here, thieves have no chance to intervene because you receive in His fullness.
Ephesians 1:18-20 – in His fullness, you get to experience, touch that which you understand, your eyes flooded with light. It’s painful to serve without eyes flooded with light because it’s easy for you to follow tradition. And you cannot correct and lead others while you have your own speck.

Back to Colossians 2: 10 (In His fullness, you are able to please God in all things. Even you too, they must be afraid of your name though you make yourself low *humble yourself* you are lifted. It is good to be circumcised by Christ. He says; “I’ve come to blind those who claim to see and open the eyes of those who don’t see” The blind man was saved (circumcised) by his confession when he said Jesus opened my eyes, I was blind. Just like Zechariah, “Oh Lord, I don’t know, You know.” That’s a confession.
If someone doesn’t believe in the work of God, where then is the spiritual circumcision? Many are struggling with breakthrough because there’s something against you – law. Tablets of stones = Law. When the devil tempted Jesus, Jesus said; “Men cannot live on bread alone but by every Word that proceeds from the mouth of God” meaning, the food – the Word.

Galatians 6:11-18 (Most people want to be accepted by people. They run away from persecution (God’s fullness) but Paul said, “I delight in persecution…”
Circumcision of the flesh is pleasing people, making impressions.
Never please any man and don’t be afraid to be persecuted. Don’t depend on anyone to connect you, depend on Christ and they will come to you because of the power of God. Be connected from above, the glory of Jesus Christ.
Verse 17 – this is extreme, you touch me, is like you touch Christ. This is more than; “touch not the oil and the wine”. Here, we find the marks of Jesus Christ. So, the brand marks of Jesus Christ are in you after those persecutions and God cannot release you without those brand marks.

What does the Bible say about wolves such as Lesego Daniel infiltrating the Church ?

For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
(Jude 1:4 KJV)

False prophets are cunning infiltrators. Jude identifies apostate preachers as men who slither into churches “in unawares.” Their plan is to subtly infiltrate the kingdom of Christ. The Greek verb translated “crept” is never used anywhere else in the New Testament. It is a very rare word that has to do with cunning speech and clever debaters.

For instance, the word is used in extrabiblical literature in a legal sense to speak of someone who pleads a case very cleverly, with guile. It is used to represent a lawyer who plants a thought in the minds of a judge or a jury by trickery. It is used to describe a criminal who secretly slips back into the country after being exiled from it.

The word “crept’ means “entered in secretly.” That is precisely what false prophets do. Deceivers have a real problem with truthfulness, openness, and honesty. They never come in announcing, “I am a messenger of Satan, and I would like to join your church.” This word “crept” literally means, “to go down into and alongside.” False prophets go down into the church and get alongside believers. They pretend to believe; but they are Satan’s counterfeit prophets. As his servants, it is their determination to destroy the work of God. Such infiltration had already begun in Jude’s day. False prophets had moved into the church and were beginning to sow lies about who Christ is, what he has accomplished, and how he saves sinners. That form of attack is nothing new. It has gone on through the centuries, is still going on today, and will continue to go on until Christ comes again. The Puritan Thomas Manton wrote…

“When the Christian church began…there were adverse powers without ready to crush it, and Libertines who, like worms bred within the body, sought to devour the entrails and eat the very bowels of it. The first ringleader was Simon Magus, and there followed many…who, being once turned aside from the truth and the fellowship of the faithful, lost all awe of God, and were given up to a sottish judgment to believe all kinds of fables and fancies….In succeeding ages the devil hath often played over the old game, sometimes oppressing the church by the tyranny of pseudo-Christians…at other times corrupting the truth by error, or rendering it suspicious by the divisions about it. Heresies revolve as fashions, and in the course of a few years antiquated errors revive again.”

They are like those adversaries of Israel described in Ezra 4:2, who came to Zerubbabel saying, “Let us build with you: for we seek your God, as ye do; and we do sacrifice unto him,” though it was their intent to disrupt the work. They are like Simon Magus in Acts 8, who wanted to be baptized and acknowledged as a follower of Christ, though he was an enemy to Christ. Peter’s words have come to pass. — “There were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction” (2 Peter 2:1). ~ Don Fortner

Read the whole of Jude and see how these Wolves will be judged by our Almighty God.

Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James, to them that are sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, and called: Mercy unto you, and peace, and love, be multiplied. Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not. And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities. Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee. But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves. Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core. These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots; Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever. And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints, To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him. These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men’s persons in admiration because of advantage. But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ; How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts. These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit. But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost, Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life. And of some have compassion, making a difference: And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh. Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, To the only wise God our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen.
(Jude 1:1-25 KJV)

Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.
(Jude 1:21 KJV)

The Quoted article in News found here : http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/SA-pastor-under-fire-over-grass-eating-followers-20140113



Grass-eating pastor now has congregation drinking petrol !

$
0
0

dl1

We last reported on the Grass-eating pastor on January 15, 2014see here :“We Eat Grass To Be Closer To God”, Says A High Profile False Preacher From South Africa

It seems now he is having his folowers drink Petrol !! * Watch the video in the gallery above and scroll to 07:15 min in the video to see the action. 

The folowing in headline news reported today.

SOUTH AFRICA

Wednesday 24 September 2014 – 9:36am
Nonkululeko Ngqola

petrol pastor

Watch Video below  

 

GA-RANKUWA - Pastor Lesego Daniel of Rabboni Centre Ministries, infamous for making his congregation eat grass, has struck again.

He now has his congregation drinking petrol and saying it tastes ‘sweet’.

It tastes like pineapple juice.

In scenes that will leave you open-mouthed, his congregation clamours desperately to have a drink of the petrol as the pastor preaches and encourages them.

Members of the church exclaim how “sweet” and “nice” it tastes, comparing it to “Iron Brew” and “pineapple juice”.

A couple of them beg the pastor to “please give us some more”.

According to healthline.com, petrol is poisonous to the body and ingesting it causes symptoms which include breathing difficulties, throat pain, burning in the esophagus, abdominal pain, vision loss, vomiting (with blood) and bloody stools.

It also causes dizziness, extreme fatigue, convulsions, body weakness and unconsciousness, which members of the congregation appear to display in the video.

A few of the followers who consumed the alleged petrol, end up collapsing on the floor, displaying symptoms similar to those listed above.

* Watch the video in the gallery above and scroll to 07:15 min in the video to see the action. 

- eNCA

What does the Bible say about wolves such as Lesego Daniel infiltrating the Church ?

For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.
(Jude 1:4 KJV)

False prophets are cunning infiltrators. Jude identifies apostate preachers as men who slither into churches “in unawares.” Their plan is to subtly infiltrate the kingdom of Christ. The Greek verb translated “crept” is never used anywhere else in the New Testament. It is a very rare word that has to do with cunning speech and clever debaters.

For instance, the word is used in extrabiblical literature in a legal sense to speak of someone who pleads a case very cleverly, with guile. It is used to represent a lawyer who plants a thought in the minds of a judge or a jury by trickery. It is used to describe a criminal who secretly slips back into the country after being exiled from it.

The word “crept’ means “entered in secretly.” That is precisely what false prophets do. Deceivers have a real problem with truthfulness, openness, and honesty. They never come in announcing, “I am a messenger of Satan, and I would like to join your church.” This word “crept” literally means, “to go down into and alongside.” False prophets go down into the church and get alongside believers. They pretend to believe; but they are Satan’s counterfeit prophets. As his servants, it is their determination to destroy the work of God. Such infiltration had already begun in Jude’s day. False prophets had moved into the church and were beginning to sow lies about who Christ is, what he has accomplished, and how he saves sinners. That form of attack is nothing new. It has gone on through the centuries, is still going on today, and will continue to go on until Christ comes again. The Puritan Thomas Manton wrote…

“When the Christian church began…there were adverse powers without ready to crush it, and Libertines who, like worms bred within the body, sought to devour the entrails and eat the very bowels of it. The first ringleader was Simon Magus, and there followed many…who, being once turned aside from the truth and the fellowship of the faithful, lost all awe of God, and were given up to a sottish judgment to believe all kinds of fables and fancies….In succeeding ages the devil hath often played over the old game, sometimes oppressing the church by the tyranny of pseudo-Christians…at other times corrupting the truth by error, or rendering it suspicious by the divisions about it. Heresies revolve as fashions, and in the course of a few years antiquated errors revive again.”

They are like those adversaries of Israel described in Ezra 4:2, who came to Zerubbabel saying, “Let us build with you: for we seek your God, as ye do; and we do sacrifice unto him,” though it was their intent to disrupt the work. They are like Simon Magus in Acts 8, who wanted to be baptized and acknowledged as a follower of Christ, though he was an enemy to Christ. Peter’s words have come to pass. — “There were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction” (2 Peter 2:1). ~ Don Fortner

Read the whole of Jude and see how these Wolves will be judged by our Almighty God.

Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James, to them that are sanctified by God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, and called: Mercy unto you, and peace, and love, be multiplied. Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not. And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities. Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee. But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves. Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core. These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots; Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever. And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints, To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him. These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men’s persons in admiration because of advantage. But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ; How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts. These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit. But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost, Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life. And of some have compassion, making a difference: And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh. Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, To the only wise God our Saviour, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever. Amen.
(Jude 1:1-25 KJV)

Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life.
(Jude 1:21 KJV)

Original news clip found here : http://www.enca.com/shock-scenes-grass-pastor-giving-his-congregation-petrol-drink


Rabboni Ministries – Lesego Daniel – Congregants drink petrol and say it tastes like pineapple juice
Viewing all 16 articles
Browse latest View live